Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Het Nkik/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Het Nkik

(-3)

Support

  1. Did some touching up. Should be good for GA status now. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12) (Chow) 15:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Needs a major expansion. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:51, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
    • How so? You know of more information about him than presented in the article? -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12) (Chow) 15:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
      • I added a "Personality and Traits" section anyway. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12) (Chow) 16:21, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
        • It's not that there's more info, it's that the level of detail currently there is stub-level. I haven't read his story in ages, but I know there's lots more detail available. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
  2. Per Acky. This could be, and must be, much longer to gain my vote. Chack Jadson (Talk) 20:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
    • Okay. I think I'll instead go for a character from a book I've read for a GAN. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12) (Chow) 21:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
  3. Per above. This is a stub with appearances & refs. Cute, but not enough. Surely you can do better!—Tommy(There are no Jedi here) 17:28, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
  4. Considering that whole parts of his story are either just touched upon, or not there at all, I'll have to go with the objections above. Greyman(Talk) 18:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments