- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Fiula Blay
- Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:09, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:I give you, a random Yuuzhan Vong. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:09, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
(3 ACs/7 Users/10 Total)
Support
- Cwedin(talk) 04:12, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Pre/IRC reviewed. Jorrel
Fraajic 04:41, April 25, 2016 (UTC) - Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:22, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Talk) 22:39, May 10, 2016 (UTC)
AnilSerifoglu (talk) 13:31, May 13, 2016 (UTC)- <-Omicron(Leave a message at the BEEP!) 00:28, June 4, 2016 (UTC)
- Cevan
(talk) 16:48, July 26, 2016 (UTC) - Imperators II(Talk) 08:19, July 27, 2016 (UTC)
- AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:13, August 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:11, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
Object
Ayrehead
Could you vary your use of the word suspicion slightly more in the body? You repeat it three times in pretty quick succession and use the phrase "to avoid raising suspicion" twice.Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:49, May 1, 2016 (UTC)- Done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:23, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
Cav
Why no PT section? Also, would an Equipment section be appropriate?- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 22:11, June 4, 2016 (UTC)- Objection(s) overridden by AgriCorps 04:53, September 15, 2016 (UTC)
- I've included a mention of their amphistaffs now. As for the P&T, there really isn't anything to say. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:07, June 11, 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough on the PT section but I'm seeing no edits to the article past mine to accommodate mention of the amphistaff. I think your edit might not have saved. - Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 11:14, June 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, odd. It should be good now. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:33, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
- As per our discussion last night, I'm working on a proper section for it and will have it done tomorrow night. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:48, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
- How does that look? Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:23, August 26, 2016 (UTC)
- As per our discussion last night, I'm working on a proper section for it and will have it done tomorrow night. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:48, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
- Hmm, odd. It should be good now. Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:33, July 4, 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough on the PT section but I'm seeing no edits to the article past mine to accommodate mention of the amphistaff. I think your edit might not have saved. - Sir Cavalier of One
- I've included a mention of their amphistaffs now. As for the P&T, there really isn't anything to say. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:07, June 11, 2016 (UTC)
AV
Could we get the full release date in the Bts?The Bts will also need to be properly sourced.- AV-6R7Crew Pit 15:22, July 4, 2016 (UTC)- Both done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:53, July 24, 2016 (UTC)
Toprawa
For starters, the novel cannot be used as a source for the 28 ABY date. That comes from Essential Reader's Companion. You will need to use specific referencing for each mention of that date. We have multiple examples of status articles that employ this method. If you need, I can show you what I find to be the best way to do it.- Will do, I'll dig out my copy after work tomorrow.
In addition to this objection, you should also specify "over Bastion" in the infobox's death field, assuming that's correct. I was kind of unclear on that.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:15, August 26, 2016 (UTC)- Clarified, death was actually above Borosk.
I want to make sure that the term "decloaked" is actually used in the source or another: "...and immediately decloaked..."Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:06, August 26, 2016 (UTC)- It wasn't used in this source, but I'm sure I've seen it somewhere. For now, I've reworded to avoid using it. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:08, September 8, 2016 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:53, September 15, 2016 (UTC)