- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Filar-Nitzan
- Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 00:33, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Possibly the only gaseous sentient species in Star Wars.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Kilson 01:40, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Another interesting species. Grand Moff Tranner 
(Comlink) 17:48, April 2, 2011 (UTC)- Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:00, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Menkooroo 03:52, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
1358 (Talk) 20:43, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Kilson
One thing. In the Biology section, "a Filar-Nitzan trained in a difficult skill had the ability to diffuse some of the damage and lesson its impact." Could you refrase this, it sounds a bit akward. Otherwise nice job. I've never heard about this species before.Kilson 00:53, March 28, 2011 (UTC)- Thanks for the review! Is that any better? ~ SavageBob 01:22, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Could you still work in how the ability was difficult to master? Kilson 01:30, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I can only explain its difficulty in game terms, which don't do much good for in-universe prose. Basically, the ability takes twice as many character points to improve as any other skill. As far as translating that into in-universe prose, the best I know how to do is to say it was difficult to master. :( ~ SavageBob 01:37, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I guess it's good enough. Nice job. Kilson 01:40, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I can only explain its difficulty in game terms, which don't do much good for in-universe prose. Basically, the ability takes twice as many character points to improve as any other skill. As far as translating that into in-universe prose, the best I know how to do is to say it was difficult to master. :( ~ SavageBob 01:37, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Could you still work in how the ability was difficult to master? Kilson 01:30, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Is that any better? ~ SavageBob 01:22, March 28, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
Is it really necessary to list all the Sources list publication dates in hidden editing view? If that ever needs to be checked, it's as simple as clicking one of those links and looking at the release date in the infobox. This isn't providing any vital service to our readers or editors.Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)- It helps this editor, so what's the problem? It's commented out anyway. ~ SavageBob 23:30, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Because it's pointless, and your articles are the only ones that do this. You're not so handicapped that you can't click a few links if the rare need ever arises. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:33, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not going to hold up the nom on something so petty, and especially since there's no real rule against doing so, but I thought I would voice my opinion on this. I just really don't think it's necessary. You have to open up editing view to see the publication dates anyway, so I don't see how that makes it any more efficient than making the same click to open up one of those links in another tab. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:00, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Because it's pointless, and your articles are the only ones that do this. You're not so handicapped that you can't click a few links if the rare need ever arises. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:33, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
- It helps this editor, so what's the problem? It's commented out anyway. ~ SavageBob 23:30, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
!
Is "incorporeal" an accurate descriptor? Gas contains atoms and is corporeal matter, while incorporeality is usually used to describe that which exists beyond the physical realm (that which is not substance, such as God or a soul).Fantastic job! I'd hate to pay that gas bill. Menkooroo 01:10, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:43, April 9, 2011 (UTC)