Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Field laser

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Field laser

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 18:44, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 03:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 417 words (68 introduction, 335 body, 14 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 416 words (68 introduction, 334 body, 14 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Wok142 (talk) 20:03, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 06:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote CometSmudge (talk) 21:58, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
  4. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 02:14, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
  5. Booply (talk) 03:19, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Object

Wok
  • Would like to see the description for the top quote note the field lasers. Could also swap quotes with the History one, I just feel like the top quote (really all quotes but top quotes in particular) should be explicit in its connection to the subject.
    • Following up on this after our exchange on Urce sector - I guess it's just my thoughts about the quotes but feel free to follow whatever precedent, informal or not, that you have been. Better to align with common practice than just my opinion. Wok142 (talk) 01:27, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
      • Yeah I'll be honest; long quote attributions aren't ideal for desktop presentation; so long as they have the to and from info, and the relevancy is present in the body text, isn't really as required as much as image caption-relevancy. I do agree that it's nice sometimes, but don't feel it necessary for this case since the information is so closely documented below in the body.—spookywillowwtalk 05:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
  • In the infobox, the white beam description is used for the Structure field, but is that the best place for that info? I feel like that field would be for describing the physical item and not the laser that it emits. Wok142 (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Hm, guess not. Removed; since no other field reasonably comes close to fitting.—spookywillowwtalk 05:23, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:27, 20 February 2025 (UTC)