Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Fi'lang

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Fi'lang

  • Nominated by: Kilson(Let's have a chat) 05:54, August 3, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Yes guys, even kids sticker books contribute to canon.

(4 ACs/3 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. This made me crack up. Go sticker books! ~SavageBOB sig 02:16, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Talrrivanian JaingHead (Headquarters)
  3. Wow...--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 12:25, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Don't ever look back! Menkooroo 02:42, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote --Eyrezer 11:42, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 19:17, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
  7. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 23:37, August 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Prepare to be savaged…
  • The description should note that there is a second point on the inside of the curve, close to the handle. That's it! ~SavageBOB sig 02:07, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
Teenage Dream
  • Do you think the infobox picture could be cropped to focus on the knives? File:Trogodile.jpg is pretty big, so you could get a large and good-quality crop out of it, making the image one of the weapons rather than the same one that's used in Trogodile. Menkooroo 05:03, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
Imperators II
  • Unless I'm mistaken, you can't source the fact that Ventress was a Dathomirian to the CW cartoon. Imperators II(Talk) 15:44, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
    • My apologies. I don't believe I added the species there, but I removed it because it was unnecessary in the article. Thanks for the review. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 15:48, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
      • Hey, Kilson, I added that. If we're going to list species for anyone, we should list them for everyone. Can you add it back? We don't require species IDs to have external sources in most cases, so I'm not sure any extra reference would be necessary. ~SavageBOB sig 16:31, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
      • Although in this case, it's necessary to describe the one dude as a Troglodile but not the other two by their species, and neither of them gets the species ID in the current revision. At any rate, this isn't an objection, just food-for-thought. ~SavageBOB sig 18:18, August 4, 2011 (UTC)
        • Eh, I don't think it's necessary to add the species for them. I hope that's fine. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 02:34, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
Eyrezer
  • The two blades are actually different, with one having a larger inner spike than the other. Can you please describe this variation in the article?
    • How's that?
      • "...a curved blade with a pair of sharpened points: the first at the end of the blade, and the second at the inside of the blade's curve..." If you compare the "the second [point] at the inside of the blade's curve" on the knife in the left hand and the knife in the right hand, the knife in the right hand has a more pronounced point. Ie, the blades are not identical. --Eyrezer 09:27, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
        • "However, the prominence and size of the spike inside of the blade's curve varied between fi'langs." Is that good? I'm not sure what you else I should add to that. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 10:57, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
          • That will do it. --Eyrezer 11:40, August 10, 2011 (UTC)
  • Also, the handle appears to be strapped. Please describe this. --Eyrezer 11:06, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:37, August 10, 2011 (UTC)