Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Fest

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Fest

• Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 23:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Andor's retcon for this was fantastic
• Date Archived: 19:48, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
• Final word count: 591 words (65 introduction, 327 body, 199 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB, WP:AST

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Best retcon ever Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
2. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
3. snazzy. also, I'm partial to Editor's suggestion :P OOM 224 (he/him) 11:13, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
4. My cat enjoyed reading this article.—spookywilloww^talk 19:44, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
5. Lewisr (talk) 19:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Object

Anil

• Can Dantooine being a planet be sourced to one of the reference books already used in references so we would have one less ref as stated in the sourcing policy?
  • Was weirdly hard to find one that crossed over but sorted.
    • I couldn't find it myself when I went through those books. Thank you for taking the time to find this one <3 Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:19, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
• (Reviewing note) Also per that policy, if more than one reference is used to cite a claim, they should be listed in ascending order. For example, ^[1][4][5], not ^[4][1][5].
• (Reviewing note) I removed the "quote=" from the {{WebCite}} since it's used for quotes relevant to the cited information, not for secondary titles. But please feel free to add it back to use it with an actual quote. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Thanks for both. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 23:44, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Imp

• Personally, I can't say I 100% understand what Shaw is trying to say in that Gamesradar article, but the BTS isn't doing a terribly good job at making it clear, either... Imperators II^(Talk) 08:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • I realise it could possibl just be talking about Cassian's adoption over the forgery, so I've just removed it to avoid the complication. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 23:44, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Comments

• Going to pull a total me move and suggest the image of Cassian used is not his infobox image, perhaps File:Andor-NewsSlider.jpg, File:Announcement-AndorS1E7.png, or even File:Cassian field jacket.png since its a different crop Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:16, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
  • As long as it's depicting Cassian, it doesn't really matter that it's the infobox image Fan26 (Talk) 18:08, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
    • It's a personal gripe I raise not as an objection but to see other people's comments, I just like a unique spread of images across site Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:58, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
      • I can see where you're coming from but ultimately I do think it should be left up to the nominator. Gotta also keep in mind that "best; most appropriate" should probably trump "less frequently used elsewhere" when choosing images. Imperators II^(Talk) 08:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
  • I went with the latter image as it's a nice expansion of what I was using already. I see no use in using more action-esque images to present a single individual unless they're more close up. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 15:07, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:47, 4 August 2023 (UTC)