Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Fehlaaur'aitel'loro

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Fehlaaur'aitel'loro

• Nominated by: Grunny ^(Talk) 07:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Legacy's Thrawn

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Well done. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 22:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
2. He's not Thrawn though. :P Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 16:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
3. Actually, I think the dude is Thrawn's second clone that came back just to be ruled by a bunch of Sith, again. It would make complete sense...probably. ;-) Kilson Likes PIE 20:06, 23 March 09 (UTC)
4. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 10:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Graestan^(Talk) 14:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Object

1. GRAESTAN IS BACK:
   • The details of Cade are a bit muddled at the end of the intro. It's like he's found, but needs to be found again. Please clear this up.
     • Done.
   • The first two sentences of the biography are a bit redundant.
     • Addressed.
   • The reason why the sabotage would cause a conflict between the GA and Empire should be explained.
     • How's that?
   • It's a bit unclear how the Sith, being described as allies of the Empire, could end a Sith-Imperial war by deposing the Emperor.
     • Reworded. It didn't, it was just at the end of the war :).
   • Please explain straight off that Fel escaped the assassination attempt and what he went to do.
     • Done.
   • Again, in the bio it's unclear why they'd need to find Skywalker again.
     • How's it looking now? Thanks for reviewing, Graestan :-). Grunny ^(Talk) 07:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
   • Graestan^(Talk) 13:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
2. Context on the Galactic Alliance and the Ascendancy.
   • Good job once again. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 09:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
     • Context added on GA, and the Chiss Ascendancy is embedded in the sentence as "two governments" :-). Thanks, Soresu :-). Grunny ^(Talk) 10:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• The quote in P&T just looks wrong. Could a comma be missing? Chack Jadson ^(Talk) 17:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes there was a missing comma. Added :-). Grunny ^(Talk) 22:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)