Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Enforcer One (dreadnaught)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Enforcer One (dreadnaught)
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Enforcer One (dreadnaught)

  • Nominated by: IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 03:43, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Insert witty comment here.

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:15, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Clone Commander Lee Talk 12:17, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote—Tommy 9281 21:14, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
  4. --TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 11:16, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 23:22, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  6. ACvote CC7567 (talk) 03:39, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:39, June 5, 2010 (UTC)


  • A dumb question, not the greatest at grammar, so I'm wondering...."Enforcer One also counted among its crew Grimorg, a Weequay who was one of Bogga's top enforcers." Does there need to be a comma between crew and Grimorg? It just seems weird to me, almost sounds like crew Grimorg is an object of sorts. Just pretend this conversation never happened if I am waaay off. TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 11:20, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
    • That would make the sentence very choppy, and would mess up the flow. Having two commas is unnecessary. IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 00:18, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
      • Gotcha, I understand. Thanks! TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem 09:12, June 1, 2010 (UTC)