- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Enforcer
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Good work.Braha'tok enthusiast (talk) 11:18, April 27, 2020 (UTC)
- UberSoldat93
(talk) 11:23, April 27, 2020 (UTC) 
Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:25, May 8, 2020 (UTC)
Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 19:43, May 11, 2020 (UTC)- MasterFredcerique 20:01, May 12, 2020 (UTC)
Object
Ben
This applies to the Compliant too. If the Star Destroyers arrive after the rebels have been defeated, I don't think that counts them as being part of the battle, as you have said in the infobox.Braha'tok enthusiast (talk) 22:49, April 26, 2020 (UTC)- I thought about that, but considering the infobox specifically says Present for battles/events, not just Involved in battles or something, I think it’s appropriate, as the ships were present and involved in that event. If you still feel strongly though, I can remove it. Tommy Macaroni 09:05, April 27, 2020 (UTC)
- If the rebels have already been defeated by the time the Star Destroyers arrive, as stated in the article, then there's no battle to be present for. Braha'tok enthusiast (talk) 09:53, April 27, 2020 (UTC)
- I thought about that, but considering the infobox specifically says Present for battles/events, not just Involved in battles or something, I think it’s appropriate, as the ships were present and involved in that event. If you still feel strongly though, I can remove it. Tommy
UberSoldat
Same objection as Compliant regarding Pii.- Done, but this is definitely a Sofixit, Shay.
Much of the article is a carbon copy of that article. Even though they both share the same biography, some rewording can be done to alleviate this.UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:54, April 27, 2020 (UTC)
- If you copy all of one article and paste it into the other, you would see rephrasing has been done. There is only so much that can be changed while retaining accuracy of the terminology used in the book, chronology of events, and the best phrasing of sentences grammar wise. I've made a couple of adjustments but I think that any more would disrupt the accuracy or grammar of the article. There is no rule saying two articles similar by nature need to heavily deviate in terms of phrasing, we just do it to some degree for the sake of variety and because it is good practice not to copy other articles. However, this should never to done to the extent that is disrupts other, more important aspects of the article. Tommy Macaroni 10:51, April 27, 2020 (UTC)
- If you copy all of one article and paste it into the other, you would see rephrasing has been done. There is only so much that can be changed while retaining accuracy of the terminology used in the book, chronology of events, and the best phrasing of sentences grammar wise. I've made a couple of adjustments but I think that any more would disrupt the accuracy or grammar of the article. There is no rule saying two articles similar by nature need to heavily deviate in terms of phrasing, we just do it to some degree for the sake of variety and because it is good practice not to copy other articles. However, this should never to done to the extent that is disrupts other, more important aspects of the article. Tommy
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:01, May 12, 2020 (UTC)