- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Endor tree fort
- Nominated by: —Axinal Convocation Chamber 19:02, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: More Ewoks
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
Kilson(Let's have a chat) 10:43, April 19, 2011 (UTC)- Nice place to visit, but… ~Savage
03:35, April 26, 2011 (UTC) - QuiGonJinn
(Talk) 17:57, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
—Tommy 9281 Saturday, May 7, 2011, 23:48 UTC
Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:13, May 9, 2011 (UTC)- Trak Nar Ramble on 20:11, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Kilson
To start off, you need to expand the intro a bit. You can incorporate the fact that the tree fort was abandoned by its creators and a few other bits of info from the History section.- Sure, how's that?—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Better
- Sure, how's that?—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
In the History section, you should explain that Wicket and Teebo found nobody living in the fort, so that's why they decided to live there.- Wicket suggested living in the fort even before they arrived, so they had made the decision to live there even before they found it abandoned. Do you still think I should include the fact that there was nobody living there at the time, even though I mention in the previous paragraph that the fort was abandoned by its builder?—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
Ah, so did Wicket know about the fort before they ran away? If so, include that piece of information.- Added.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 10:29, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Wicket suggested living in the fort even before they arrived, so they had made the decision to live there even before they found it abandoned. Do you still think I should include the fact that there was nobody living there at the time, even though I mention in the previous paragraph that the fort was abandoned by its builder?—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
I noticed in the "Affiliation" field of the infobox, you say "Wicket Wystri Warrick and Teebo (briefly)", but not Larry. Why?- I considered adding Larry, but he lived in the tree itself, and the episode shows no evidence that he actually lived in the fort. I thought adding that would be borderline speculation.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:32, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I misread the article, I though it said Larry lived inside the fort itself.
- I considered adding Larry, but he lived in the tree itself, and the episode shows no evidence that he actually lived in the fort. I thought adding that would be borderline speculation.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:32, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- That's all I have. Good job Kilson(Let's have a chat) 23:49, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Kilson!—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
What Trak Could Track
- Made some copy-edits here and there, took care of some redundant linking, added links, etc.
- Thanks for that, Trak. I de-linked fire, as it leads to an individual.
In the History section, was there any indication on how long Wicket and Teebo stayed there prior to Larry's appearance?- They only stayed for a day, which is included in the article as such: "...the fort was in poor condition, so the Ewoks spent the day repairing it..." and later on, "That night, the two Ewoks prepared several traps..."
- That's pretty much all I could find. Trak Nar Ramble on 05:25, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Trak!—Axinal Convocation Chamber 10:29, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged…
Do we know that the builder abandoned it? Perhaps he or she sold it, or died, or something. I guess technically that's still abandonment of a sort, but I'd rephrase things to suggest that the place was abandoned, just not by whom, unless the cartoon specifies it was the builder, of course.- Nope, it's never specified in the cartoon. I've rephrased that passage; what do you think?
- I reworded your description of the Kagles, since we don't know if "Kagle" is a species name, a surname, etc. Otherwise, nice work! ~Savage
02:30, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review and the copy-edit, Bob!—Axinal Convocation Chamber 02:43, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:07, May 9, 2011 (UTC)