Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Endor tree fort

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Endor tree fort
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Kilson
        • 1.1.2.2 What Trak Could Track
        • 1.1.2.3 Prepare to be savaged…
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Endor tree fort

  • Nominated by: —Axinal Convocation Chamber 19:02, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: More Ewoks

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Kilson(Let's have a chat) 10:43, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Nice place to visit, but… ~SavageBOB sig 03:35, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
  3. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:57, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote—Tommy 9281 Saturday, May 7, 2011, 23:48 UTC
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:13, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
  6. Trak Nar Ramble on 20:11, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Kilson
  • To start off, you need to expand the intro a bit. You can incorporate the fact that the tree fort was abandoned by its creators and a few other bits of info from the History section.
    • Sure, how's that?—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
      • Better
  • In the History section, you should explain that Wicket and Teebo found nobody living in the fort, so that's why they decided to live there.
    • Wicket suggested living in the fort even before they arrived, so they had made the decision to live there even before they found it abandoned. Do you still think I should include the fact that there was nobody living there at the time, even though I mention in the previous paragraph that the fort was abandoned by its builder?—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
      • Ah, so did Wicket know about the fort before they ran away? If so, include that piece of information.
        • Added.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 10:29, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
  • I noticed in the "Affiliation" field of the infobox, you say "Wicket Wystri Warrick and Teebo (briefly)", but not Larry. Why?
    • I considered adding Larry, but he lived in the tree itself, and the episode shows no evidence that he actually lived in the fort. I thought adding that would be borderline speculation.—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:32, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
      • Sorry, I misread the article, I though it said Larry lived inside the fort itself.
  • That's all I have. Good job Kilson(Let's have a chat) 23:49, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review, Kilson!—Axinal Convocation Chamber 01:53, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
What Trak Could Track
  • Made some copy-edits here and there, took care of some redundant linking, added links, etc.
    • Thanks for that, Trak. I de-linked fire, as it leads to an individual.
  • In the History section, was there any indication on how long Wicket and Teebo stayed there prior to Larry's appearance?
    • They only stayed for a day, which is included in the article as such: "...the fort was in poor condition, so the Ewoks spent the day repairing it..." and later on, "That night, the two Ewoks prepared several traps..."
  • That's pretty much all I could find. Trak Nar Ramble on 05:25, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review, Trak!—Axinal Convocation Chamber 10:29, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
Prepare to be savaged…
  • Do we know that the builder abandoned it? Perhaps he or she sold it, or died, or something. I guess technically that's still abandonment of a sort, but I'd rephrase things to suggest that the place was abandoned, just not by whom, unless the cartoon specifies it was the builder, of course.
    • Nope, it's never specified in the cartoon. I've rephrased that passage; what do you think?
  • I reworded your description of the Kagles, since we don't know if "Kagle" is a species name, a surname, etc. Otherwise, nice work! ~SavageBOB sig 02:30, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review and the copy-edit, Bob!—Axinal Convocation Chamber 02:43, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:07, May 9, 2011 (UTC)