Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Eleemosynary

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Eleemosynary

  • Nominated by: Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:50, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Presenting Elemosinary Ellemasynory that ship with the weird name.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. -- 1358 (Talk) 21:14, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Don't forget that quotes within quotes use 'single quote marks'. —Master Jonathan New Jedi Order (Jedi Council Chambers) 21:21, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:03, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:08, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 17:04, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Toprawa
  • 1stm tag, please. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:03, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
  • This statement is technically incorrect, since the Alliance had transitioned into the New Republic by his death in 5 ABY. The Teshik article itself also supports that he was executed by the New Republic. Please amend this statement as appropriate: "but his refusal to retreat resulted in his capture and eventual execution by the Alliance."
  • Please be aware that, for linking purposes, there is a difference between an ISD and an ISD-I. In this statement you claim it's an ISD, yet you link to the ISD-I article. If it's an ISD-I, please state this. If it's ambiguous, please link to the ISD article: "the Eleemosynary was established as being an Imperial-class Star Destroyer."
  • Contrary to the BTS's explanation, this article includes an ISD category. I believe this should be removed. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:58, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
The hot dog stand around the corner
  • "that Peña likely applied the name to Teshik's command ship." Do you mean it was Pena, not Wallace, who created the name, or that the name simply came from that word? As is, it reads (to me) like "the Eleemosynary was named the Eleemosynary." So yeah. :P A bit nit-picky perhaps, but it's a fine article. If this objection is too vague or you disagree, just bring it up on IRC. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:10, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:04, August 12, 2010 (UTC)