- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
EGL-21
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:23, April 14, 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: I assume Jason Fry got Geetaw and Amps confused, but until someone says otherwise this guy's apparently a competent welder despite his lack of arms.
(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
MasterFred
(Whatever) 06:28, May 23, 2018 (UTC)- 1358 (Talk) 21:47, June 18, 2018 (UTC)
- --Lewisr (talk) 21:52, June 18, 2018 (UTC)
- Tommy
Macaroni 07:30, June 19, 2018 (UTC) - Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 12:03, July 2, 2018 (UTC)
- Imperators II(Talk) 11:23, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
Object
Tommy
You're in Category:Pages with missing permanent archival links.Tommy Macaroni 07:03, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
- There's always something extremely obvious I forget to check... Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:12, April 15, 2018 (UTC)
AV
Are we sure that the EGL-1 power droid is an actual thing? From what I can tell, the TFA Visual Dictionary just liked identifying droids by name, immediately followed by their classification, and wasn't indicative of a specific model.- Hmm, I guess this is up to interpretation. The databank and Visual Encyclopedia also refer to this droid as EGL-21 "Amps" Power Droid, a format that usually indicates a model rather than a individual. I'd be interested to see what others think. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:32, April 25, 2018 (UTC)
- After looking at the other Visual Dictionaries I think you're right in saying that it isn't a model, just confusing formatting. The databank is still odd, but is clearly talking about an individual droid, not a model. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:20, June 3, 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, I guess this is up to interpretation. The databank and Visual Encyclopedia also refer to this droid as EGL-21 "Amps" Power Droid, a format that usually indicates a model rather than a individual. I'd be interested to see what others think. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:32, April 25, 2018 (UTC)
Per Tope's objection here, I don't think it's necessary to include that EGL-1 was a second class droid outside of the infobox. Simply mentioning that he was a power droid should suffice.- AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:15, April 19, 2018 (UTC)- Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:32, April 25, 2018 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
"Second class droid" is infobox-exclusive.MasterFred(Whatever) 22:55, May 5, 2018 (UTC)
- It was removed per AV's objection based on previous nominations. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:16, May 6, 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, not sure how I didn’t notice the objection directly above this one. MasterFred(Whatever) 17:05, May 7, 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, not sure how I didn’t notice the objection directly above this one. MasterFred
- It was removed per AV's objection based on previous nominations. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:16, May 6, 2018 (UTC)
Imp-21
Characteristics: "EGL-21 was an EGL-21 power droid" — this is neither linked nor mentioned in the infobox.Imperators II(Talk) 12:20, June 20, 2018 (UTC)- Oops, a relic of a previous objection. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:55, June 20, 2018 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 11:23, July 3, 2018 (UTC)