Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Drebb

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Drebb
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support votes
      • 1.1.2 Objections
        • 1.1.2.1 spookly
        • 1.1.2.2 Ayrehead
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Drebb

  • Nominated by: ThePedantry (talk) 08:22, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The datapad message is archived on Wookieepedia:Star Wars Outlaws screenshots
  • Date Archived: 07:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 442 words (41 introduction, 332 body, 69 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 376 words (28 introduction, 291 body, 57 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 01:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 02:04, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Master FredceriqueCommerce Guild(talk) (he/him) 05:19, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • For an article of this length, it would be normal for the intro to have 1-2 sentences added to it as just one is too concise unless the body portion below is really just 165, generally, and this is above that by a margin.
    • Updated
  • "this article does not assume any one being killed during the quest to be Drebb." seems to conflict with the body and the infobox indeed indicating Drebb died in 3 ABY (particularly the infobox, since that is claiming its 100% had to occur, whereas I guess in the gamemechanics tags its still an option). Was Drebb's death was confirmed some other way? In some form at least the existing BTS note should be tweaked to clarify.—spookywillowwtalk 15:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
    • There's probably a better way to phrase it. What I was trying to covey is that while they appear in the game we don't know which one of the Pyke members they are so I can't include a physical description or a image. I could probably just remove that sentence? ThePedantry (talk) 01:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Removed that sentence. ThePedantry (talk) 01:13, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
  • If Drebb is said to have died during the clam incident, wouldn't that indicate having died on Toshara? As it relates to including Toshara in the the infobox's death field.—spookywillowwtalk 01:46, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Good catch, updated. ThePedantry (talk) 01:52, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
      • Copy-edit for the future; do note we avoid double-ref usage in birth/death fields.—spookywillowwtalk 01:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • I do think the BTS needs to clarify that while Drebb is in the game, it's unclear which of the Pykes present the name applies to. Also, if all of the Pyke members present are members of the Pyke species then Drebb must be of the same species. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Added clarification around identification and appearance. The pyke members that appear are all wearing armor so I'm hesitant to go so far as to definitively state they are a Pyke since the group does employ non Pykes on Toshara. ThePedantry (talk) 21:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
      • Hmm, do you mind if I reword it to something like "They are one of several Pyke Syndicate members that have to be killed as part of "The Broker" quest, during which the character is identified by the "Instructions for Drebb" datapad. The datapad does not specify which of the Pyke Syndicate enemies specifically is Drebb, making the character's visual appearance unclear." Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:19, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
        • Go for it. words are hard and I like yours better. ThePedantry (talk) 00:46, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
  • I seem to recall that the datapad with the message to Drebb is on a speeder bike by the meeting site? That seems worth including as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Yeah the mention of the speeder was good addition. ThePedantry (talk) 21:14, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 05:19, 31 October 2025 (UTC)