Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Dono

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Dono

  • Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 07:38, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: What article did I decide to expand? Dono.

(5 ACs/2 Users/7 Total)

Support

  1. This article is worthy of being a good article, it is nice to see that someone cares about the characters from the old roleplaying games. Exiledjedi 21:34, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Very, very clean. Graestan(Talk) 21:48, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Nice work. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 05:48, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Well done. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:39, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:57, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Snowball? 1358 (Talk) 21:20, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
  7. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 22:11, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Moffship
  • It would probably be best if you clarify that the Thrifty mentioned in the BTS is the "Momship" mentioned in the body. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:15, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
    • Good point; I've used both terms in the body now. Thanks! ~ SavageBob 21:37, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • We know as fact that the Rebellion era begins with the theft of the Death Star plans at the Battle of Toprawa, prior to the Battle of Yavin, meaning that anything after the Battle of Yavin is Rebellion era by default. Given that, and for the sake of making our reference notes and concise and succinct as possible, I'd like to see reference 2 condensed to just say that the adventure takes place after Yavin, rather than getting into the Carlist Rieekan/2 ABY info, which isn't really necessary. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:36, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
    • Reference 2 is cited twice, though; once for era, and once for the body, where the 0-2 ABY date range is given. I'd hate to lose the date range, since it's as precise as we can get, and changing the reference in the infobox would actually make there be more refs rather than fewer. So, I'm not sure it would help, in other words. ~ SavageBob 00:36, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
      • Ah, yes, you're definitely right. I didn't even notice it was referenced twice. You're fine, though the reference's date for the Battle of Yavin should probably be revised. The book correctly places the battle in 0 BBY, not ABY. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:44, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments