Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Di Mantid

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Di Mantid

• Nominated by: Skifffy (talk) 04:35, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• Date Archived: 23:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
• Final word count: 633 words (88 introduction, 327 body, 218 behind the scenes)
• Word count at nomination time: 619 words (88 introduction, 334 body, 197 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Women

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

1. Lewisr (talk) 21:46, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
2. —spookywilloww^talk 19:55, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
3. ThrawnChiss7 ^{Assembly Cupola} 18:14, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
4. Panther436 (talk) 23:03, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew

• The BTS has room for one of the book's mentioned covers, perhaps Jango Fett: Bounty Hunter? Lewisr (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Added Skifffy (talk) 04:54, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
• The first date note should probably include the databank and what it says, at first I was a bot confused about why it was there. And I would just change your prose to note she was a frequent patron instead of that she became one Lewisr (talk) 00:35, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Tweaked Skifffy (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

spookly

• Is the sentence "All three books were released on April 23, 2002." all sourceable to just the one Amazon ref? Would've thought each book would need its own to support that claim, unless there's some other source that does have all three.—spookywilloww^talk 23:36, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Oops, fixed. Skifffy (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Panther

• The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia also mentions that the club was in the Uscru Entertainment District so I'm not sure why the Fact File 44 ref is necessary.
• There is an unnecessary ref at the end of the second to last sentence of the first bio paragraph. Wanted to point it out instead of just removing it in case it's there because something is missing, if not, it should be removed. Panther436 (talk) 01:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Both fixed. Skifffy (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)