Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Destruction of the Hall of Assembly

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Destruction of the Hall of Assembly

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 23:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 00:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Final word count: 493 words (130 introduction, 346 body, 17 behind the scenes)
  • Word count at nomination time: 470 words (121 introduction, 332 body, 17 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELSWP:MD

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Zed42 (talk) 00:24, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Lewisr (talk) 05:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
  3. Wok142 (talk) 00:08, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
  5. ACvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 00:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Object

Zed
  • The Hall of Assembly itself currently isn't given context in the body before it's mentioned in the last sentence of Dissolving the mirrors. Zed42 (talk) 23:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
  • I know the intro's fairly long already, but I think there should be a brief mention of the anti-treaty motivation behind the attack. Zed42 (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Added; but rearranged most of it so it only added two words in the end (as you said, intro's c. over 1/3 of the body which is semi borderline).—spookywillowwtalk 00:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Imp
  • I realize that "Mission to Pijal" is an official name, but nevertheless, might it be less awkward - given that the prev field already does disambiguation for the other mission to Pijal - to also disambiguate that one? Imperators II(Talk) 12:53, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
    • Did do so, but insist on the capitalization remaining because it's pretty prevalent across sources.—spookywillowwtalk 15:37, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
      • That still seems a bit awkward to me, but less so, and it's not a hill I'm willing to die on. :P Imperators II(Talk) 12:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Would it be better to use an image from the book's cover, or is it just preferred to use the more realistic image? CometSmudge (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

The answer is admittedly that it doesn't usually matter so much as long as it's timeline-adjacent. In the case of Master & Apprentice though, since so many status articles use the same book cover, we also swap between a small handful of other images (such as this one) on a lot of the noms to save the monotony in a quasi-sort of a precedent.—spookywillowwtalk 18:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)