Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Debacle on Ord Torrenze

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Debacle on Ord Torrenze
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Manoof
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Debacle on Ord Torrenze

  • Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:06, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Brand-new stuff from the Handbook

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Assuming Manoof's objections are not really answered by the book itself. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 05:12, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 05:28, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Manoof (talk) 10:13, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
  4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:23, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
  5. ACvote IFYLOFD (💩) 01:11, January 12, 2015 (UTC)
  6. Inqvote Supreme Emperor (talk) 06:17, January 17, 2015 (UTC)

Object

Manoof
  • Just had a quick look and one thing jumps out at me—the military equipment cost, the way it is in the article is it does not include the AT-AT itself, nor the armour or equipment of the stormtroopers etc. Is it indicated if it is in or exclusive of these costs?
  • What was the result of the conflict? I'll have another quick look when I get a chance. Manoof (talk) 05:09, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • I will preface my response to both of these objections by politely saying that you make the mistake of assuming that I don't consider all of these things in writing the article. The cost of equipment is presented exactly as the book does with no more or no less detail. And we don't know the result of the conflict; we only know that the AT-AT was destroyed. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:22, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
      • I thought that was the case but just wanted to check.Manoof (talk) 10:13, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
  • It's my personal preference, so completely up to you but could we get a specific date of the book's release, since it is the only source? Manoof (talk) 10:13, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 00:00, January 18, 2015 (UTC)