Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Cyanogen silicate

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Cyanogen silicate

• Nominated by: Cade Calrayn 17:43, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Project Hero intrudes on FloydProject: Lost Tribe

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Floyd's gonna get angry. ;) 501st dogma^(talk) 23:37, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
2. <-Omicron^{(Leave a message at the BEEP!)} 01:27, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
3. You and your damn silicate can burn in hell IFYLOFD ^{(Enter the Floydome)} 03:19, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
4. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:27, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
5. ew grs MasterFred^(Whatever) 22:33, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:02, October 1, 2013 (UTC)

• Possible to link to its constituents cyanogen and silicon? -- Riffsyphon1024 00:44, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
  • Cyanogen yes, but there's nothing to say that it's related to silicon. Cade Calrayn 00:56, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
    • Assuming the laws of chemistry remain the same for this universe, silicates have silicon in their structure. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:00, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
      • The keyword being "assuming". 1358 ^(Talk) 20:42, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
        • Well, this is English. If the creators of the content did not want it to have silicon in it, they wouldn't have used the term "silicate." The fact that "silicate" is specified means there is silicon. MasterFred^(Whatever) 22:33, October 1, 2013 (UTC)