- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Crev Bombaasa
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: This is one of my favourite Legends pulls in the new canon films.
- WookieeProject (optional):
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
That's a nice pull by Pablo for sure. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 00:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)- VergenceScatter (talk) 19:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
- Commander Code-8 Hello There! 14:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
- UberSoldat93
(talk) 20:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC) 
MasterFred(talk) 07:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Object
Macaroni
The Legends page specifies that he appeared in Crisis, which should be added and then sourced via {{DarkStryder}}.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 15:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)- Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
CC-8
The film and the official guide need to have full release date since they're being discussed in tandem.Commander Code-8 Hello There! 05:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)- Accompanying has always been sufficient to say they came out on the same day. Happy to discuss if you disagree, but this will effect almost all of my Disney Era status articles :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. Accompanying doesn't exactly confirm that the dates were the same, and per the LG: This means that films… reference books… should only provide a publication year, …The exception to this rule is when two sources are being discussed in tandem. In such a case, the month and/or full date may be provided as necessary, particularly if both sources were released in the same year. I'll put a message out on Discord if that wording as is has been accepted in reviews so far. I've still got to update all my GB articles for concurrent dates so I understand that it's a hassle. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 10:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, I believe I actually wrote that bit of policy but generally the terms saying that a book was "accompanying" or "released in conjunction with a film" has been accepted. For reference here's a small sample of some of the other status articles that use accompanying: 1MSE-KUP24, B8G-H0R, G2-1B7, KMD-RA-71, Diles Anevi, Boshti Anilee. Again, I'm still happy to discuss if you disagree with this interpretation though. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay. Accompanying doesn't exactly confirm that the dates were the same, and per the LG: This means that films… reference books… should only provide a publication year, …The exception to this rule is when two sources are being discussed in tandem. In such a case, the month and/or full date may be provided as necessary, particularly if both sources were released in the same year. I'll put a message out on Discord if that wording as is has been accepted in reviews so far. I've still got to update all my GB articles for concurrent dates so I understand that it's a hassle. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 10:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- Accompanying has always been sufficient to say they came out on the same day. Happy to discuss if you disagree, but this will effect almost all of my Disney Era status articles :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 07:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)