Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Control (CR90 corvette)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Control (CR90 corvette)

Nominated by: Dat1899 (talk) 11:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination comments: Thank you to User:Green Tentacle, User:UberSoldat93, User:Supreme Emperor, User:OOM 224, User:Erebus Chronus, User:VergenceScatter, User:Hanzo Hasashi, User:JediMasterMacaroni, User:LucaRoR, User:YakovChaimTzvi, User:Jaymach and others for their help.
WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

~~#YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk)~~ 02:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

For real this time — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Good work for your first GAN. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 19:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
MasterFred(talk) 20:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

Erebus

~~Characteristics goes before History.~~
- Fixed.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Intro could definitely be expanded to give a quick summary about what it did, just saying that it was a Corellian corvette use by the Empire during the war in a training simulation doesn't seem like enough.
- Added a little more information.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
~~Italicization for the Delta-class DX-9 stormtrooper transport~~
- Mended.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Per Grievous's frigate or Battlecruiser 17, individual ships do not share the same specifications or manufacturer as the class they are a part of. As such, unless it is specifically confirmed by a source, please remove both the Corellian Engineering Corporation and hyperdrive rating from the page. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 03:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Repaired. Also added some information from the game itself.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Yakov

~~I don't think "corvette" should be a "role" in the infobox since it's already the "class"~~ -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed.--Dat1899 (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
(Review note): when you need to italicize something that is linked, if you want to display the exact article title, do not pipelink it like [[Executor|''Executor'']]; instead do ''[[Executor]]''. Only pipelink and put the italicization inside the pipelink if you need to for some reason, such as [[Executor/Legends|''Executor'']] or [[Imperial-class Star Destroyer|''Imperial''-class Star Destroyer]]. If this isn't clear, please ask on #user-help on Discord. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the suggestion,.--Dat1899 (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
  - Note: I struck this for Jocasta purposes, but the advice stands. It's been moved to #Comments -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni

~~Is there a relevant image we can add for the body?~~ JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 16:19, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- There is the image of the outpost the TIE Bombers attacked, though I think it needs to be up to date (meaning it has to be a screenshot from the newer version of the game), but I can add it nonetheless.--Dat1899 (talk) 11:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  - Update. Added image and quote. As well as correcting some mistakes.--Dat1899 (talk) 10:32, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
~~"used by the Galactic Empire during the Galactic Civil War within an Imperial simulation" -- it's unclear to me if this ship actually existed or if it only was ever a thing within the simulation.~~ JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- I think "within an Imperial simulation" describes it all. We don't know if this was a real ship, and it is only known to be featured in a simulation. Hence "within an Imperial simulation".--Dat1899 (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  - Okay, so in that case I'd like the body to be a little more clear. Right now it implies it to be a definitely real ship up until the end of the History section, and even then a reader might think that Control is real and featured in the simulation. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
    - I've tried to fix all I could see to make it clear that this was a simulation.--Dat1899 (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
~~Per ample precedent, the article title should be "Control (CR90 corvette)" instead of the current title. Mantooine (CR90 corvette) and Tantive V (CR90 corvette) are two examples.~~ JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- Fixed with a lot of help from User:Ayrehead02.--Dat1899 (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
~~"Minor flagship" is only mentioned in the infobox/intro and needs to be added to the body as well.~~ JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Done. Anything else?--Dat1899 (talk) 20:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

~~I haven't played the combat chamber missions, but does the game actually call this ship a "minor flagship"?~~
- it's not referred to as a flagship at all. However, since it is the main ship Alpha Squadron return to in the game, and since it's far too small than an ordinary flagship. I think it's fair to say it serves as a "minor flagship".--Dat1899 (talk) 14:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  - It's speculation that needs to go then. "Command ship" is sufficient enough as it is. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
    - Fixed.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
~~Is the Cavalry an ISD I or II? The communications tower between the domes is the giveaway, should be a straightforward task to do in the Special Edition.~~ UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unknown, could be either since the ISD I's were later changed to look like ISD II's. I'd leave it ambiguous for now. --Dat1899 (talk) 14:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  - As I said, you can identify the ship in the Special Edition. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
    - Fixed. Anything else?--Dat1899 (talk) 15:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments

(Review note): when you need to italicize something that is linked, if you want to display the exact article title, do not pipelink it like [[Executor|''Executor'']]; instead do ''[[Executor]]''. Only pipelink and put the italicization inside the pipelink if you need to for some reason, such as [[Executor/Legends|''Executor'']] or [[Imperial-class Star Destroyer|''Imperial''-class Star Destroyer]]. If this isn't clear, please ask on #user-help on Discord. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Please review my revisions. Thanks. Loqiical (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
- They look completely fine. Sorry about the capitalization. And thank you for your help.--Dat1899 (talk 20:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Does TIE Fighter specify if the shields are deflector shields or physical armor shielding? Loqiical (talk) 06:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- I can only assume physical armor.--Dat1899 (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
  - Ok, I think it's all good. Loqiical (talk) 05:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)