- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Chiraneau
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Last of the DS2 hangar officers and completing the canon Havord set as well!
- Date Archived: 19:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Final word count: 718 words (76 introduction, 261 body, 381 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 715 words (75 introduction, 260 body, 380 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
—spookywillowwtalk 03:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)- Lewisr (talk) 03:56, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- JMAS
Hey, it's me! 05:36, 2 December 2024 (UTC) - --Vitus InfinitusTalk 20:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Objection handled via Discord. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 18:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Object
Comments
- A couple of things: the first is unlike with subjects on the Death Star before the Battle of Yavin in ANH, on the Executor during the Battle of Endor, etc, there are enough subjects on the Death Star awaiting Palpatine or Vaders' arrivals who weren't present on the station during the Battle of Endor, so I don't exactly think mentioning the Death Star's destruction after is of value for this article. Doesn't help that Chiraneau in Legends is a literal example. Also, it seemed there was reasonable doubt brought up about Mike Havord being Chiraneau, so I question that element of the behind the scenes. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:29, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also of note: as the Legends counterpart is a status article, if Mike Havord is to be evaluated as reliable to state as portraying the character, then it's best for that info to be added back to the article after it was previously removed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- To the first point I think it's still worth mentioning that the only location this character is pictured is destroyed not longer after they're pictured there, even if it's perfectly possible Chiraneau survived as it still provides context that they definitely weren't there for much longer either way. I've got a newer reference to an autograph site with authentication which is usually good enough for our purposes, it can be re-added to the Legends article with the same reference but thought I'd let this nomination finish first before adding it incase there were objections. Also please don't just remove valid uses of the singular they, I've re-added them to avoid reptitive wording. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Ah okay, and so I added back the Mike Havord information to the Legends article with the citation used here. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- To the first point I think it's still worth mentioning that the only location this character is pictured is destroyed not longer after they're pictured there, even if it's perfectly possible Chiraneau survived as it still provides context that they definitely weren't there for much longer either way. I've got a newer reference to an autograph site with authentication which is usually good enough for our purposes, it can be re-added to the Legends article with the same reference but thought I'd let this nomination finish first before adding it incase there were objections. Also please don't just remove valid uses of the singular they, I've re-added them to avoid reptitive wording. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also of note: as the Legends counterpart is a status article, if Mike Havord is to be evaluated as reliable to state as portraying the character, then it's best for that info to be added back to the article after it was previously removed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)