Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Chandrila Skies

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Chandrila Skies

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 18:20, September 13, 2015 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Trip391 (talk) 05:50, October 24, 2015 (UTC)
  2. ProfessorTofty (talk) 02:05, October 25, 2015 (UTC)
  3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:04, November 1, 2015 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:15, November 13, 2015 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:46, November 15, 2015 (UTC)
  6. ACvote IFYLOFD (Talk) 03:18, November 20, 2015 (UTC)

Object

  • One of the few pages that links to Chandrila Skies is Toile Senn, who according to that entry was part of this Hardpoint Squadron. Perhaps a bit more could be mentioned about the individual members of Hardpoint Squadron, so that readers learn more about the people involved and not just a unit?
    • Eh, I don't think it's relevant to the article, since I've already stated Skywalker as the squadron leader and that it's an all Jedi unit, which is all that is needed. However, I have added that Senn was killed in the barrage as well.
  • The Corellian system was challenging the Galactic Alliance's authority - perhaps a bit about why, the history of why things had come to that point?
    • Added a bit about them desiring more independence. If reader's want more detail on the history they can always follow the link to the Second Galactic Civil War page.
  • When you say in the Behind the scenes that the description is "similar" to a space-capable version of Uulshos' LAVr QH-7 Chariot, how exactly? Just looking at their stats, one appears to be a speeder vehicle and the other is a shuttle, one holds 12 passengers, while the other appears to be designed to hold cargo. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:12, October 23, 2015 (UTC)
    • Eh, that should probably be removed, as it is mostly speculation on my part. It's gone now. Thanks for the review. 501st dogma(talk) 19:02, October 24, 2015 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • You link to Chandrila in the body, but could you mention it with context somewhere? Something like "the vessel shared its name with the planet" in the body or BTS. Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:34, October 31, 2015 (UTC)
    • There. 501st dogma(talk) 16:03, November 1, 2015 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Does the source actually use the word "antispacecraft"? If not, I would suggest putting a hyphen after "anti". Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:15, November 2, 2015 (UTC)
    • Looks like Betrayal doesn't use it with a hyphen, so we should be good. 501st dogma(talk) 01:43, November 5, 2015 (UTC)
      • So, to be clear, it does explicitly use the word "antispacecraft"? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:27, November 5, 2015 (UTC)
        • Yes. 501st dogma(talk) 00:01, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

Comments

  • First time doing one of these reviews, so I hope my thoughts are helpful. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:12, October 23, 2015 (UTC)
  • Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:18, November 20, 2015 (UTC)