Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Chagras

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Chagras

  • Nominated by: Jinzler 12:02, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Some more Knight Errant

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Sounds like a good novel. Holocron Greatholocron (Complain) 03:16, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
  2. Très bon. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:15, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:37, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 09:37, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 22:19, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object

I like this article a lot

I like the article, but it should be longer.  ANR0328 ♦ 2/25/11 - 14:57 (UTC) (Vote struck, reason: Per policy: Objection does not fall under any of the GAN rules -- Grunny (talk) 04:15, March 4, 2011 (UTC))

  • This is hardly a valid objection. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 15:51, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
  • The article covers all of the canon information that is currently known about Chagras, so I struggle to see how it could be lengthened. Could you be more specific? --Jinzler 20:10, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
    • I am new I don't know sorry.  : (  ANR0328 ♦ 2/26/11 - 00:14 (UTC)
      • That's perfectly fine, it takes a while to get used to the GAN process, :) If you satisfied with the article as it is, then I request that you strike your objection. If you can see any more specific problems with the article, the please let me know. Thank you. --Jinzler 17:42, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
Holocron
  • "but before he could conquer many he worlds, he killed by a nerve toxin in 1,040 BBY, under unexplained circumstances." Something is wrong here...
    • Reworded. --Jinzler 19:24, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
  • "who controlled a large empire in the" Is there a link to that empire? Holocron Greatholocron (Complain) 00:38, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
    • There is now. Thanks for your review. --Jinzler 19:24, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
Fred strikes
  • Several grammatical errors in the intro. Also, I believe several words are actually missing.
  • Major misuse of commas throughout the entire article.
  • MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:37, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
    • These objections most likely fall under the {{Sofixit}} category, so we urge you to fix any minor mistakes yourself. If you find you need to leave something for the nominator to resolve, please cite actual examples from the text that need work. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:40, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
      • I fixed at least most of them, hopefully all. Check my edit to see what I did. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:56, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
        • Thank you, you did a good job. --Jinzler 20:57, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
          • No prob. In response to your message, it's no big deal. I'm sure this article is in better condition than mine were when I nommed them. :P MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 21:10, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Species infobox fields needs to be sourced. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:34, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • I can't believe I missed that. Fixed. --Jinzler 18:56, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:19, March 4, 2011 (UTC)