- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Caysin Bog
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:13, May 18, 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Probably my favourite Rogue One extra.
(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
How are we supposed to review the article if the guy doesn't even have a head? Imperators II(Talk) 08:45, May 23, 2017 (UTC)- Cevan
(talk) 22:12, August 2, 2017 (UTC) - MasterFred
(Whatever) 01:48, August 16, 2017 (UTC) - Cwedin(talk) 07:03, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
- Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 16:15, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
- 1358 (Talk) 19:21, August 28, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Fred strikes back
"to create the subservient Decraniated cyborg servant class" in the Bio is redundant. Either remove "subservient" or "servant." I really like the word "subservient," but I'll let you choose. :P- Subservient is indeed a good word. Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed some comma issues, but that should be all. Yay for more canon! MasterFred(Whatever) 06:40, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fixes and review! Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, August 13, 2017 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
First sentence of the intro is a bit too long for my liking. You can probably add a full stop after "high-gravity world". I also recommend including his sex in the first sentence.- Split as recommended. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:30, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
"he also performed upon the Decraniated servant class." I'm not sure this is worth mentioning in the intro of this character.- Removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:30, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
"to make room for an Imperial patrol including a[2] TX-225 GAVw "Occupier" combat assault tank[1] to pass through." I feel like including this full long name is a bit clunky. According to the article however, it seems to also be known by some shorter name variants. Maybe one of these could be used; thoughts?1358 (Talk) 22:42, August 24, 2017 (UTC)- Shortened it to just TX-225A Occupier tank. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:30, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
Toprawa
Should the SW.com article with the teaser trailer video not be included in the Sources list? I'm not sure how we've been handling this with TFA and other RO characters, but that's as much a source of information as anything else.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:35, August 27, 2017 (UTC)- Since it's technically a unique source of information I think you're probably right. I've added it and classified it as his first mention since it's a source. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:11, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
- I've changed it to {{1stp}}. Imperators II(Talk) 11:33, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
- Since it's technically a unique source of information I think you're probably right. I've added it and classified it as his first mention since it's a source. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:11, August 27, 2017 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:21, August 28, 2017 (UTC)