- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Brangus Glee's species
- Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:19, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: For WP:ALIENS.
(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
- 501st dogma(talk) 14:30, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 00:06, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 13:57, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
Winterz (talk) 19:23, July 19, 2013 (UTC)- No issues.—Jedi Kasra ("Indeed.") 23:16, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 01:31, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
Object
I remember this nom....
The biology section is reffed to 2, while the distinctions part of the info, which houses the same info (long neck etc...), is sourced to 1. Remedy.You reff the fact that Glee is brown to 2 in the body, and to 1 in the infobox. Remedy.- Otherwise, good work. 501st dogma(talk) 21:14, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed both. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:55, June 30, 2013 (UTC)
El Jefe
Just one thing: The Thinker reference should probably have a note in the BtS, not just the quote.IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:09, July 4, 2013 (UTC)- Done. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:47, July 4, 2013 (UTC)
Cav
I think explaining how the image was manipulated for the CCG would be advisable. Was it simply adding a background, or something else?- Sir Cavalier of One(Squadron channel) 15:04, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Explained, just adding a background. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:39, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
The CCG card states that Brangus Glee is a Force-sensitive, which is not just game-mechanics. Surely this deserves to be mention in the article someplace.- Well I thought that was more relevant for the Brangus Glee article, but added.
If I'm reading the BTS correctly, the CCG card was also the first item to actually canonize this species as an in-universe subject, whereas Chronicles and BTM are just behind-the-scenes pictures of the unused maquette. That needs to be detailed in the BTS.Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:44, July 30, 2013 (UTC)- Well I thought the way the source list was written already made that clear. Nonetheless, have edited accordingly. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:53, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 01:31, July 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Originally a CAN that I realized reached more than 250 words. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:19, June 28, 2013 (UTC)