Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Bearus

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Chairman Bearus

• Nominated by:—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 01:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Fat kids love cake.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Always a pleasure, Nine Two Eight One. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 01:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 15:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
3. Cylka^-talk- 01:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
4. Clean prose. Good work. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
5. Grunny ^(Talk) 08:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Object

1. Soresu
   • Intro says Human, infobox and body say humanoid.
     • Addressed.
   • the hideous monster it had been transformed into by Aleema's Sith magic attacked him. What is 'it'? If it's the comlink you're referring to, you're better off stating it outright. Not everyone assumes that comlinks can transform into monsters. Also, does Keto get captured here, or does he get caught later? SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 08:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
     • Addressed. Thanks, TwoThree. Please advise if anything further is required.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 21:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
       • Still missing the last sentence of this objection. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is a lie)} 05:10, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
         • Oops, should be good now. Check out the beginning of the next paragraph.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 23:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
2. Cylka:
   • Shouldn't Bearus be affiliated with the Tetan Monarchy as well? I would have added it, but I wasn't sure to which source I could reference it to.
     • Addressed.
   • hideous monster - Did someone claim that it was hideous? Otherwise it sounds a bit POVish.
     • Addressed.
   • The audio drama has a redundant reference in the first paragraph of the Krath takeover section. I didn't remove it since I wasn't sure if you meant for it to be a different reference.
     • Addressed.
   • Another good one, Tommy! Cylka^-talk- 03:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
     • Pleasure doing business with you, Cylka. Please advise if anything further is required, thanks.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 08:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
3. Toprawa:
   • Objection/question: Is there a specific reason why he's not just referred to as a Human? Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
     • I know, it was peculiar to me as well. The Star Wars Encyclopedia said humanoid, so I went with that. I have no problems returning it to human, though. Please advise.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 21:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
       • Nah, that's ok then. If that's what it says, that's what it says. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• More short, sweet, TOTJ goodness.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 01:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
• Quick question: Are all those words in the quotes meant to be italicized? Example: "Now—let me continue. As you can see, the smelters are operating at peak efficiency Lord Keto. With all the new starship construction, the demand for carbonite is higher than ever. As usual, you will receive a generous share of the profits." Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 15:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes, per the comic.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 17:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
    • It still looks off. Are you positive? Remember, for the quote I wrote above, everything not in italics would have been italicized in the comic itself. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 21:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
      • Should be good now.—Tommy ^{(Nine two eight one)} 13:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)