Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Bavos-I heavy-duty military space platform

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Bavos-I heavy-duty military space platform

  • Nominated by: 501st dogma(talk) 21:41, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Reviewing and noming articles here has made me a bit of a book critic. I'm like, "You're using the verb bellow twice in the same sentence. Change it up please..."

(5 ACs/0 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 23:06, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
  2. ACvote IFYLOFD (Floyd's crib) 22:55, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Winterz (talk) 01:41, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 21:20, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:03, May 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Summerz
  • In the body, if it's below a hundred-and-one, then numbers must be in written form.
    • There you go.
  • You should probably ref the Bts. Winterz (talk) 17:55, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
    • Sourcing is not required in the BtS. If it were a bigger article with more sources I might do it, but this one only has one source. Thanks for looking it over. 501st dogma(talk) 18:00, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
      • Lol, I know that. It's just that "This article assumes" makes it begging for a ref but anyway, it's okay I guess. Winterz (talk) 18:56, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
Cav
  • I think the intro could stand to be expanded a little.
    • Better?
  • You mention the cargo tugs in the body, but not the number stationed aboard the station.
    • "...that up to a dozen cargo tugs be..." Isn't that the number there?
  • Do we have any info on what kind of duties the Station 2LC/Blue performed that could be added to the article? - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:58, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
    • Added. Thanks for looking it over. 501st dogma(talk) 21:33, April 12, 2013 (UTC)
Cadeth
  • Could you boost the intro a bit more? Mention its length and the size of its crew; you could probably tack that on to the beginning of the second intro sentence. Cade GalacticRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 18:44, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • As a preliminary objection, I find it strange that you never actually refer to the vessel by its full, formal name at any point throughout the body of the article. This should probably be done upon first mention in the Description section, which may require a little rewording between those first two sentences of that section. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:44, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 20:03, May 7, 2013 (UTC)