Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Battlecruiser 19

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Battlecruiser 19
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Fancruiser 26
        • 1.1.2.2 Braha'tok 19
        • 1.1.2.3 Ecks Dee
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Battlecruiser 19

  • Nominated by: Erebus Chronus (Talk) 03:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: The other battlecruiser
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW, WP:CIS

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  2. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 19:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Take care with underlinking and punctuation. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
  4. ACvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 21:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 12:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

Fancruiser 26
  • "Sometime after their retreat, the Republic returned to the system for a second attack on the blockade. Following their return, the Republic fleet sent a starfighter squadron commanded by Skywalker's Padawan, Ahsoka Tano, to attack the blockade" "Attack the blockade is used at the end of two consecutive sentences here. Fan26 (Talk) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Reworded. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 20:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Sorry it took a month and you reminding me to get back to this Erebus, I depend on the bot to ping me far too much :/ Fan26 (Talk) 03:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Braha'tok 19
  • "As Battlecruiser 19, alongside the three other frigates, arrived in the system and assumed their designated attack positions, thereby reinforcing the blockade, the Republic forces were caught off guard as the three Venators suffered extensive damage, which therefore forced them to withdraw." This sentence has too many parts to it. I would like to suggest splitting it.
    • Sure.
  • "Responding to the query, one of the droid commanders ordered the frigates to commence fire on the Resolute, but during their barrage of turbolaser fire, the Republic squadron was able to destroy all six Munificents, including Battlecruiser 19." I have similar feelings with this sentence as well. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 13:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Your feelings regarding this one are in fact noted, but it's fine. I'm not splitting things where it's unnecessary, mainly because that's not my writing style and it looks fine as it is. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 21:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
      • I disagree. But I don't feel my opinion is strong enough to object further on this. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 17:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
  • I think you need to establish in the body that the Munificents arrived from hyperspace to reinforce the blockade. Right now it sounds like they were just chilling nearby.
  • The Y-wings' participation in the second assault is intro-exclusive.
  • Given there are two distinct attacks on the blockade, you need to clarify in the Commanders and crew section which attack you are referring to.
  • A link to Unidentified OOM command battle droid 2 (Ryloth blockade) can be included somewhere in the article, at least in the Destruction of the blockade quote attribution. 1358 (Talk) 21:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
    • All done. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 04:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 12:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)