- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Battle of the Sluis sector
- Nominated by: Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 18:32, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Trying to round up some of the smaller GGW battles.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- Gulomi Jomesh 07:42, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
Grand Moff Tranner 
(Comlink) 19:25, June 30, 2010 (UTC)- Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:27, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Grunny (talk) 01:07, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
JangFett (Talk) 05:04, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
Object
Gulomi Jomesh
A source is needes that Sluis Van is the target of the atack. All given sources speek only about the Sluis sector.- My reasoning for that was the Shipyards—the only known shipyards in the Sluis sector. I thought the reference was obvious, but if you or others think it needs to be kept ambiguous, I can make the change.
- The only other sourdes for the Sluis Van shipjards are ober 3.600 years later, and that special shipyard was destroyed in the battle. So I see no reason to assume that it is the same. Gulomi Jomesh 22:22, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, its been adjusted. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 00:22, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Just fixed a few direct mentions of Sluis Van that were left. Gulomi Jomesh 07:42, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, its been adjusted. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 00:22, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
- The only other sourdes for the Sluis Van shipjards are ober 3.600 years later, and that special shipyard was destroyed in the battle. So I see no reason to assume that it is the same. Gulomi Jomesh 22:22, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- My reasoning for that was the Shipyards—the only known shipyards in the Sluis sector. I thought the reference was obvious, but if you or others think it needs to be kept ambiguous, I can make the change.
You might also mention in the BTS-section, that that image of the battle was taken directly form an image of Kuat from Empire at War.- The problem ith saying it was "taken from" is that those words are a very definitive claim, and one that I don't have a reference for. I have, however, made note of the similarity in the BTS. Let me know if that's satisfactory.
- Thats good. Gulomi Jomesh 22:22, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- The problem ith saying it was "taken from" is that those words are a very definitive claim, and one that I don't have a reference for. I have, however, made note of the similarity in the BTS. Let me know if that's satisfactory.
- All in all it's a good article. Gulomi Jomesh 20:51, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 22:16, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 05:04, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- One question: In the intro and the body, you mention that the Sith Empire's navy led the attack; however, in the infobox, there is no mention of the fleet. Is there some uncertainty about the navy's involvement in the battle? Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 01:21, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, no. My apologies, that was an oversight on my behalf. It's been rectified. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 08:16, June 30, 2010 (UTC)