Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Battle of Sullust (Galactic Civil War)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Battle of Sullust (Galactic Civil War)

  • Nominated by: DjMack 03:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

  1. "The Expanded Universe never elaborated on the said event until Star Wars Battlefront: Renegade Squadron was released in 2007, giving the details of the battle." - Not true, Star Wars: X-Wing Alliance featured the massing of the fleet at Sullust. Thefourdotelipsis 06:02, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
    • I've never played that game, would you be able to add any info that comes from that game into the article? DjMack 06:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
      • It's actually quite a large level, and will require a fair bit of work. I suggest asking around on IRC - I personally won't be able to get that info in the forseeable future. Thefourdotelipsis 23:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
  2. Clone prelims
    • Sourcing in the intro is a big no-no.
    • The intro overall needs to be expanded. What happened during the battle? Not to the point where it's disproportionate to the length of the article itself, but only stating the battle's purpose is not sufficient.
    • I don't know why, but there are unnecessary spaces between each ref. Please go through the article and fix.
    • Date needs to be mentioned in the intro.
    • No links in quotes.
    • Is there a specific reason that the article's name has the date? If not, it needs to be Battle of Sullust (Galactic Civil War).
    • Please link to the actual articles instead of redirects, as you did for Darth Vader.
    • Please refer to the Manual of Style and Layout Guide and make sure that the article adheres to both.
    • CC7567 (talk) 07:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
  3. Mauser
    • Crop the IGN logo out of the onfobox image.
    • "humiliating Darth Vader during the Battle of Hoth" - needs context.
    • In casualties section: Possibly entire garrison - an Assumption.
    • MauserComlink 20:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AgriCorps only)

  1. ACvote No replies to objections left since 24 May, user has been warned of the situation on talk page on 12 June by CC7567 and failed to reply on this page. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 16:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)