Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Battle of Falleen

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Battle of Falleen
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 OOM
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Battle of Falleen

  • Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I did not know I could have more than two GANs up, so here we are
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  2. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) ChissAscendancyCanonSymbol (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  3. VergenceScatter (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
  4. ACvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
  5. ACvote OOM 224 21:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

OOM
  • My edits
    • Saw them, they look good :P. Did make a minor change to a date note Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Do we know whether the battle was at Falleen or on Falleen? The article seems to be using these two different prepositions interchangeably, and the meaning can be different depending on the one being used since using "at" rather than "on" indicates that the battle took place high above ground. OOM 224 23:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
    • The helmet collection issue calls it a "victory on Falleen", so the article reflects both at and on Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
      • I would replace "at" with "on" then, to clear things up. OOM 224 21:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
        • Done Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)