Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Battle of Carida

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Battle of Carida
    • 1.1 (0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Moffship
        • 1.1.2.2 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Battle of Carida

  • Nominated by: Grand Moff Hopkins 23:57, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:The article is well written and is from an excellent game.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Moffship
  • This article needs to be properly sourced, per GAN rule 10. Please make sure that all requirements are met before nominating an article. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 01:44, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Respectfully speaking, this article has more issues right now than I care to enumerate. Grand Moff Hopkins, if you in fact have a vested interest in seeing this nomination reach Good article status, it's going to take a lot of time and work on your part. If indeed you are prepared to buckle down and see this project to the end, the very first and best thing you can do to help yourself is to take some time and read through Wookieepedia's Manual of Style and Layout Guide to understand our article formatting policies. Also take some time and look at some of Wookieepedia's other Good articles, specifically the battle articles, and use those as a reference to see what a battle GA looks like. Once this nomination looks like those articles, you'll be ready for GA status. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:59, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
    • I can't see anything else wrong with it, I have compared it to another good article (Battle of Falleen (Clone Wars)) and the only differences are the length, amount of images and that the Battle of Carida has no Notes and references section. Are these differences very important? User:Grand Moff HopkinsImperial Emblem
      • Seriously, Grand Moff Hopkins, if you have read the nomination rules you would know that the notes and references section is very important and required for articles with more than one source/appearance. 1358 (Talk) 20:41, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
        • Its just that I tried to include it but couldn't exactly get it to work out. It said cite error or something allong those lines. Also the only thing it appeared in was Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption. But I will make a second attempt. User:Grand Moff HopkinsImperial Emblem
        • OK I managed to get it to work, should this suffice? User:Grand Moff HopkinsImperial Emblem
          • No, that's not how it's done. I suggest you allow this nomination to be removed, and then work on it; I am glad to help you. 1358 (Talk) 21:03, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
        • Very well. User:Grand Moff HopkinsImperial Emblem
        • It is done. User:Grand Moff HopkinsImperial Emblem

Comments

  • Removing per nominator request. 1358 (Talk) 21:22, January 2, 2011 (UTC)