Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Banjeer

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Banjeer

• Nominated by: Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 00:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Going through GAN process before FAN process.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Pointless. Bring this to FAN, most ricky-tick. Graestan^(Talk) 22:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
2. Grunny ^(Talk) 13:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
3. Looking good. CC7567 ^(talk) 20:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
4. SoresuMakashi^{(Everything I tell you is the truth)} 07:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
5. Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 11:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Object

1. Should probably mention the fact that there's a Banjeer family estate on Anaxes, even though we can't draw the direct conclusion that the Admiral himself is from there. Coruscant and the Core Worlds, page 47. -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 01:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
   • I don't have that book. Is that all the information? And thanks for the other image. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 14:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
     • Alright, I added the info to the BTS. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 15:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
2. Clone attack
   • "Banjeer became one of the Imperial Military officers to become a member of the Imperial Interim Ruling Council..." It sounds strange, because "become" is used twice. Do you mean "Banjeer became on of the first Imerial Military officers to become a member"?
     • No, because not all Council members had been in the Military. I took out "became," however. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 19:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
   • "Jax's plan had paved the way for the Council's control of the remnants of the Empire, and any attempt at negotiations would spell destruction for the Council and the Empire." The Council and the Empire are mentioned twice, and it sounds rather redundant. Please reword if possible.
     • Done. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink)
   • The capitalization of "Council" and "council" seems to switch back and forth. If there's a reason, please clarify.
     • Done. (No need to go into explanation on why capitalization wasn't consistent.) Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 19:01, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
   • Other than that, the article looks great. CC7567 ^(talk) 05:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments

• If a better infobox image is desired, I'll try to get one. Grand Moff Tranner ^(Comlink) 00:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 11:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)