Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Artistic Integrity (song)

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Artistic Integrity (song)
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Kilson
        • 1.1.2.2 Cav
        • 1.1.2.3 Toprawa
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Artistic Integrity (song)

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 17:36, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: CA-to-GA Project Part 3

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Yay!!!!! Music!!! MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 18:11, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:38, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Kilson(Let's have a chat) 23:23, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Provided Cav's bit is handled. 1358 (Talk) 19:14, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
  5. OLIOSTER (talk) 02:03, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
  6. ACvote Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:40, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Kilson
  • You never clearly state in the article that the band was pro-Imperial.
    • Addressed.
  • Also, give some context to the Imperial Board of Culture.
    • Addressed.
  • I'm curious as to why you put "By the Rebellion era" in the infobox. I'm not familiar with in-universe art noms, so could you please explain what this signifies?
    • That's the wording we settled upon on the CAN page. See this nomination for the relevant discussion.
  • That's all I have. Good job. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 19:51, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks for the review, Kilson. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:16, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Cav
  • I think some explanation that "Ars Dangor" is a pseudonym is needed to avoid confusion with the Imperial advisor. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 11:31, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
    • Addressed. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:37, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
Toprawa
  • Even though both items are technically the same, and I understand why you include them both, the article still requires a 1stm tag somewhere. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:56, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
    • Addressed, I think. I don't see any other way to get around this. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:37, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
      • That should work. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:51, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

  • Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:40, April 26, 2011 (UTC)