Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Anjelica Huston

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Anjelica Huston

• Nominated by: Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 09:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I love Wes Anderson movies and have seen Daddy Day Care an ungodly number of times
• Date Archived: 17:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
• Final word count: 343 words (61 introduction, 282 body, 0 behind the scenes)
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Creators, Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Women, Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Visions

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
2. Fan26 (Talk) 22:59, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
3. —spookywilloww^talk 14:43, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
4. Lewisr (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
5. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Object

spookly

• There isn't a ton of precedent yet, but possible to source Huston's pronouns to one of the sources used for the infobox? (I see the top quote for instance, may be usable). A similar issue recently came up in a CA case in which the article was tweaked to use they/them pronouns after finding it not sourceable, which seems like the general direction precedent is heading in.—spookywilloww^talk 14:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
  • I've adjusted the body sourcing, not sure it ought to be done in the infobox as well if I'm interpreting the listedpronouns field instructions properly. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:47, 5 June 2023 (UTC)