Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Ace Merrick

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Ace Merrick
    • 1.1 (3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Cav
        • 1.1.2.2 El Jefe
      • 1.1.3 Comments

Ace Merrick

  • Nominated by: Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:45, January 1, 2014 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I'm running out of these guys.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. 501st dogma(talk) 22:39, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 13:09, January 21, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Great game. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 21:19, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
  4. ACvote grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 10:21, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
  5. ACvote IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 02:38, February 18, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Cav
  • Rebel Assault II designer Vincent Lee's storyboards and scripts document, dated November 16, 1994, included a brief description of Rece. - I assume this should actually read "description of Merrick"? - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 08:47, January 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • Yup. Copy and paste fail. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:17, January 15, 2014 (UTC)
El Jefe
  • Context on Rookie One? IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 03:38, February 7, 2014 (UTC)
    • How's that? Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:29, February 12, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

  • Is Ace mentioned in more than one CSWE entery? If so, the CSWE part of the Sources section should be formatted like it is in the references, save for the page number. If is Ace mentioned in multiple entries, then the format that you are currently using is okay. 501st dogma(talk) 18:12, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
    • He's only mentioned in one entry, but it's not standard practice to use the {{CSWECite}} template in the sources section. It was always intended for notes and references and the sources section only needs to list the book. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:22, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
      • I did it the way you have it here in some of my initial nominations, but they were changed in copyedits by reviewers to the other way. However, since it doesn't really matter, I'll support. 501st dogma(talk) 22:38, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
  • Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:38, February 18, 2014 (UTC)