Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/AV-6R7/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 AV-6R7/Legends
    • 1.1 (4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)
      • 1.1.1 Support
      • 1.1.2 Object
        • 1.1.2.1 Spookly
        • 1.1.2.2 OOM
      • 1.1.3 Comments

AV-6R7/Legends

  • Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:11, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Date Archived: 09:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition

(4 ACs/0 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ACvote —spookywillowwtalk 21:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 23:10, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
  3. ACvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 06:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  4. ACvote snazzy OOM 224 (he/him) 09:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Object

Spookly
  • Small bit of context for MerenData if convenient?—spookywillowwtalk 17:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
    • Is being described as what manufactured AV-6R7, with the ref note of all that class of droids being manufactured, not enough? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
      • Hmm, I more meant prose-wise, if it were an entity named something like 'Y Company/Manufacturer', it's more self evident as to what the entity is in the self-contextualizing sense. As someone unfamiliar with the sources, the way the sentence reads to me leads me to ask what MerenData is—which at least from it's main page, could be noted as a droid manufacturing corporation (or some other descriptors).—spookywillowwtalk 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
        • Resolved via Discord.—spookywillowwtalk 21:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
OOM
  • Nice to see this finally nommed.
    • For the image, you might want to ask someone like JMAS for a higher quality image with maybe increased brightness, because right now the picture is a bit squint even when viewed in full size.
      • Asked on Discord.
        • Got an image, replaced, hope what I got is alright. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
    • The battle didn't really end with the Executor's crash, so some rewording in the intro and Bio would be nice.
    • I suggest establishing that the Death Star II was under construction over Endor in the first paragraph so that readers unfamiliar with ROTJ would make the connection when you mention the Executor (over Endor as well) in the second paragraph.
    • For the bit about the Tydirium, it would be good if you could explain the event's significance to the article subject (i.e. specify that AV was present in the bridge crew pits). OOM 224 (he/him) 09:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
      • I have addressed all these. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 14:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)