- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
4D6-J-A7
- Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:36, May 25, 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Yet another character who almost certainly died offscreen in Rogue One.
(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
- - Tommy-Macaroni
(Talk) 18:00, May 25, 2017 (UTC) 
Imperators II(Talk) 04:47, May 26, 2017 (UTC)- Cevan
(talk) 15:21, August 6, 2017 (UTC) 
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:52, August 27, 2017 (UTC)- 1358 (Talk) 19:22, August 28, 2017 (UTC)
Object
Imperators II
"like all RA-7 protocol droids was manufactured by Arakyd Industries[1]" - this wording, along with the reference just citing Star Wars Character Encyclopedia, is currently not sufficient, since you can't just reuse that same reference for the manufacturer in the infobox (the Encyclopedia doesn't mention 4D6 and therefore can't be a direct source for her manufacturer). I suggest you move the wording connecting 4D6 to other RA-7s into that ref note.- Made both references more detailed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:59, May 25, 2017 (UTC)
Does The Ultimate Visual Guide establish the Galactic Civil War as starting before the Battle of Scarif? If not, I suggest you change the wording "during the GCW" to reflect she was present just for the very beginning of the GCW.- I always completely forget that none of the stuff in Rebels counts as the Galactic Civil War. Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:59, May 25, 2017 (UTC)
Just want to check, the Citadel Tower article uses the definite article, while this article doesn't. Which one is correct?Imperators II(Talk) 14:26, May 25, 2017 (UTC)- I should use the definite article you're right. Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:59, May 25, 2017 (UTC)
Ecks Dee
The first sentence of the intro is a bit too rushed for my liking. I recommend you move the Scarif mention a bit further, around where you introduce Citadel Tower.- Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:19, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
"Due to protection against intrusion that her databanks received," What did she receive, protection or intrusions or what? This is a bit unclear. It would probably be clearer to say that they applied protection to her databanks or somethin g similar.- Reworded it to be clearer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:19, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
- This is still a bit unwieldy. The way it's presented in Characteristics is clear, but the intro bit is not quite there. Might I suggest "As a result of intrusion protection applied on her databanks, 4D6-J-A7 developed..." 1358 (Talk) 22:49, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:25, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
- This is still a bit unwieldy. The way it's presented in Characteristics is clear, but the intro bit is not quite there. Might I suggest "As a result of intrusion protection applied on her databanks, 4D6-J-A7 developed..." 1358 (Talk) 22:49, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Reworded it to be clearer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:19, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
I believe programmed gender would be more appropriate in Characteristics rather than the Bio.1358 (Talk) 20:58, August 17, 2017 (UTC)- Moved as suggested. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:19, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
- I also recommend moving this info the the beginning of Characteristics. 1358 (Talk) 22:49, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Switched. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:25, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
- I also recommend moving this info the the beginning of Characteristics. 1358 (Talk) 22:49, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
- Moved as suggested. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:19, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:22, August 28, 2017 (UTC)