Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/4B-EG-6

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

4B-EG-6

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 07:39, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Despite literally having EG-6 in its name, every source clearly identifies this droid as a GNK.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

1. Imperators II^(Talk) 15:53, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
2. Jim The Lamproid (talk) 22:24, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
3. It's like there's not even any real difference between the two. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 01:14, September 9, 2017 (UTC)
4. MasterFred^(Whatever) 00:46, October 5, 2017 (UTC)
5. 1358 ^(Talk) 17:03, October 10, 2017 (UTC)

Object

Imperators II

• Intro: "4B-EG-6 was ready in the base's landing zones" — ready for what?
  • Changed to waiting. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:45, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
• Could you add some context for why the droids were so excited in "Fan Droids"? IIRC, they were watching a hologram of R2's exploits.
  • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:45, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
• I removed the image where 4B-EG-6 was the least visible since he article was becoming a bit overcrowded. Imperators II^(Talk) 15:31, September 8, 2017 (UTC)

AV

• According to Star Wars Character Encyclopedia: Updated and Expanded, GNKs were manufactured by Industrial Automaton, information that is missing from this article. - AV-6R7^{Crew Pit} 23:32, September 8, 2017 (UTC)
  • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:57, September 9, 2017 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• Could we get some context on the First Order it the first paragraph of the Bio?
  • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:20, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
• I would definitely consider the droid's color to be more green than gray. Maybe describe it as "grayish-green?"
  • I'm actually happy to just change it to green, especially since it's far more green in the blips artwork. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:20, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
• Not really an objection because the template automatically does the backup link, but the backup link in the TFA opening date ref is not working for me. Does it work for you? Mine says "Access denied." MasterFred^(Whatever) 22:24, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • Yeah I get access denied as well. I guess the template needs de-lua-fying? Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:20, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
    • The template doesn't use a Lua module, and it does support an |archivedate= parameter, per the template's page. In this case, however, I believe the culprit was the .html extension in the provided URL. Imperators II^(Talk) 08:50, October 5, 2017 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:03, October 10, 2017 (UTC)