- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
3B3-21
- Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 11:57, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Compelling.
(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Grunny (Talk) 06:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- No offense, but they kind of get repetetive after to read 3 or 4 of these 3B3 articles Kilson likes PIE 19:37, 11 February 09 (UTC)
- Not really. They are reworded. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 08:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Cylka-talk- 12:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Cavalier One(Squadron channel) 13:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Roger roger. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 20:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Object
- Toprawa:
I'm assuming some kind of appearance can be had for this guy in the novel and comic.Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)- Nope, sorry. Thefourdotelipsis 04:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
The (Indirect appearance) would be so simple. The droids who stopped them in the hallway are mentioned in the book. That's enough. Graestan(Talk) 03:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)- It might be simple, but it's incorrect. The adaptations stray from the source repeatedly, and particularly in the relevant scenes. If it's anything, it's a (Possible appearance), but even that would be stretching that particular idea. Thefourdotelipsis 05:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I've gone back and added the book as a (Possible appearance). Thefourdotelipsis 05:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- If I can just stick my head in here, I oppose the existence of (Possible appearance) and think it looks awful on a GA/FA. I don't have an opinion either way on it but I think a BtS note about it would be more prudent than a (Possible appearance), imho. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I'll do a BtS note if it makes everyone happy, but there's no way I'm putting those listings up there with anything but a (Possible appearance). Thefourdotelipsis 22:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- If I can just stick my head in here, I oppose the existence of (Possible appearance) and think it looks awful on a GA/FA. I don't have an opinion either way on it but I think a BtS note about it would be more prudent than a (Possible appearance), imho. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I've gone back and added the book as a (Possible appearance). Thefourdotelipsis 05:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- It might be simple, but it's incorrect. The adaptations stray from the source repeatedly, and particularly in the relevant scenes. If it's anything, it's a (Possible appearance), but even that would be stretching that particular idea. Thefourdotelipsis 05:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
- I added a plating color to the infobox as decided per the most recent Mofference. Please check that the color is acceptable. Cylka-talk- 12:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)