Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/2163

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

2163

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:38, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: As suggested by Erebus Chronus. I think this dialogue exchange might be my least favourite in any of the films, I've never worked out why the droid asks where they're going after Qui-Gon has clearly already said.
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Fan26 (Talk) 02:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
  2. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:48, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
  3. Beautiful choice of a BTS quote. NBDani (talk) 12:21, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
  5. ACvote Love your bisectioning OOM 224 16:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  6. ACvote UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 16:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat
  • We don't really need a separate ref for the Trade Federation Script's name. This is in the same boat as Aurebesh names and the canon Galactic Grid in the case of astronomical articles, in which we can actually "see" it on screen if that makes sense. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 13:59, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
    • I included the reference for what the alphabet is actually called rather then the translation of it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
      • Examples of a similar case with Aurebesh: 1, 2, 3, 4. None of these cite the name to another source since that is what we can see on screen. In my opinion, it would be like citing the name of a character's species to another source even though we can visually discern as such from looking at them. UberSoldat93 ClanMudhornSignet-Redemption (talk) 15:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
        • Eh, bit of a grey area but fair enough. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:40, 3 May 2022 (UTC)