Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/126

< Wookieepedia:Good article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

126

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 16:06, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: CA-to-GA Project Part The Last

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. Clone Commander Lee Talk 17:12, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
  2. ACvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:42, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
  3. ACvote Kilson(Let's have a chat) 05:16, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
  4. ACvote Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:19, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
  5. ACvote 1358 (Talk) 19:43, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Kilson
  • After talking it over with a few other Users on the IRC, I believe there's just enough info to assume that 126 was masculine-programmed. Just because one droid in a different episode was masculine, that doesn't mean the entire series was masculine. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 21:58, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
Moffship
  • Isn't there anything for a Characteristics section? It's been a while since I read these comics. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 19:46, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
    • Seeing as 126 appears only in one panel and has exactly one line of dialogue, no, not really. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 21:27, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:43, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


  • While this isn't an objection, I'm not sure about that masculine-programming ref you added. It might be stretching the facts a little far, but I would like a few more opinions on this. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 20:44, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
    • I'm going to have to agree with Kilson on this one. You can't say that 126 was a masculine-programmed droid just because droids of the same model had masculine programming in "Rookies." The tactical droids of TCW are proof of this. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:10, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I would have argued with that before the introduction of female tactical droids, but I agree now. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 10:12, May 3, 2011 (UTC)