Wookieepedia:Featured article reviews/Massacre on Lenico IV

< Wookieepedia:Featured article reviews
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article that failed review. Please do not modify it.

Massacre on Lenico IV

  • Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
  • Date Requested: 01:59, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Date Archived: 08:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Object

  • There should be more subject-tied images added, and the ones there sized up. Additionally, the captions should tie in better to the subject matter.
  • "Multi-year battles, campaigns, or similar events..." from the LG infobox section means that the Minos Cluster campaign, by definition of its own reference note, violates this standard and since it's both irrelevant and a multi-year campaign, should not be in conc.
  • Several of the events are flat-cited to sources that the Massacre on Lenico IV doesn't have as a source. Thus, these all need explanatory reference notes or to be changed to source that does mention both and their chronology.
  • Particularly, "there have not been any other engagements that have been confirmed to have occurred between these three." is not up to modern standard, as simply something not being present isn't indication of the opposite being a must. The two that have this language also both mention the Minos Cluster; both to be cleaned up.
  • Dromund Kaas missing context.
  • Ideally, given there's room, the Main template can simply be prosified and linked rather than used; as it's fallen out of practice on SAs.
    • Have to correct this: it's not about merely linking that subject, and it hasn't exactly fallen out of practice on status articles, either. The Main template is used to point out to the reader that the respective section of the article is really just a short summary or extract of another subject that has an article with much more info. It's used, for example, on articles on planets that have an Inhabitants section where predominantly just a single native species is described - the species article is then additionally linked to via the Main template. Imperators II(Talk) 08:29, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  • BTS is unsourced. But also, may need a bit of trimming since the re-release info is unnecessary.

Comments

  • Marked as on probation at 1 month unaddressed. Lewisr (talk) 01:43, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Vote to retain Featured status

Vote to strip Featured status

  1. Inqvote Two months unaddressed Lewisr (talk) 05:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 05:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Imperators II(Talk) 08:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)