Wookieepedia:Featured article reviews/Hamo Blastwell

< Wookieepedia:Featured article reviews
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article that passed review. Please do not modify it.

Contents

  • 1 Hamo Blastwell
    • 1.1 Objections
    • 1.2 Comments
    • 1.3 Vote to retain Featured status
    • 1.4 Vote to strip Featured status

Hamo Blastwell

  • Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
  • Date Requested: 00:30, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Date Archived: 22:54, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

  • Outstanding fact tags.
    • This is addressed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Is there not enough info here for a conjecturally named homeworld article to be made?
  • Reference 3 seems to imply at least some sort of c. or "between X and Y" date range could be included for birth years.
  • Some of the sections with more than three paragraphs should be re-sectioned further, which then also allows for more quotes and images and visually appears better to the modern standard.
  • There's most likely skills/equipment information that should be documented in their own sections.
  • The BTS does seem to include some unnecessary fluff on the back end of the first BTS paragraph.—spookywillowwtalk 00:30, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
    • Ideally all fixed. With the original Empire infiltration section being one section before being split, originally there was no quote to begin with. I have left it that way. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
      • I added a quote from Stele. Note the source of the quote is separate from the media in which Stele is convinced to defect. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Noticed there was a lot of locations/characters mentioned that lacked contexts, so those should be run through and added for any
  • The publication year for TIE Fighter: The Official Strategy Guide should be moved outside of brackets and mentioned in prose Lewisr (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Got both. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:02, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to retain Featured status

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 22:33, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Fan26 (Talk) 22:34, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 22:53, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Vote to strip Featured status