Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Will Scotian/Legends

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Will Scotian

  • Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Rogue Squadron pilot from Shadows of the Empire (didn't fight at Battles of Yavin and Endor). 1,688 words.

(5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total/INQCON 5)

Support

  1. Inqvote Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 16:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Wonderful. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 19:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
  4. Inqvote Excellence. Grunny (Talk) 06:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
  5. Inqvote -- Darth Culator (Talk) 19:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Object

  1. From the Moffship of Grand Moff Tranner:
    • "Once Isard was defeated, the real Rogue Squadron returned to the New Republic, and Scotian returned to his original unit." - what original unit?
    • ...and that's it. Well done, Tope. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 00:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
      • No more specific info than that. The book just says that all the temporary Rogues except Hobbie and Janson returned to their original units. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
        • Sorry - I forgot to add something. "Original unit" in this case could refer to his position at the Oracle Base, so I was thinking that "prior unit" would be more appropriate than "original unit" in this case. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 12:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
  2. One thing for you:
    • "Will Scotian was not related to Pedna Scotian, a Chev pilot who later served with Rogue Squadron during the campaign to defeat rogue Imperial Warlord Zsinj, circa 7.5 ABY." I don't think that's necessary there, since you explain it in the BTS. Otherwise, nice job. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Well, the difference is that that sentence is explicitly canon, whereas the other information regarding Pedna is not. Whether Vitas and co. took that information from Allston's Web site when filling out the Will Scotian entry in CSWE I don't know, but the article would be losing information if that were to be removed. It would cease to be "comprehensive." Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
  3. One noodle
    • I would like to see the dates added and cited in the succession box for the previous and next Rogue Two if available. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 17:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Done and done. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments

  • Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 19:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)