- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Vernid
- Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 11:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Nomination comments:
- Date Archived: 21:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Final word count: 1362 words (241 introduction, 1101 body, 20 behind the scenes)
- Word count at nomination time: 1340 words (242 introduction, 1078 body, 20 behind the scenes)
- WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS
(4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support
- Wok142 (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 09:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)- —spookywillowwtalk 19:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- CometSmudge (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Lewisr (talk) 23:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Booply (talk) 01:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 21:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Object
Wok
In The past was not forgotten, how was the first agent fatally killed?Wok142 (talk) 03:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)- Cleaned that bit up. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
spookly
"Inhabitants on the planet included…"—given there's a couple sentences on the back end of Description only describing residents, shouldn't that be an Inhabitants section? I've seen ones with shorter.—spookywillowwtalk 06:01, 13 June 2024 (UTC)- Is the inhabitants field not specifically for species that originated on the world? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, IU LG has native or resident species for anyone who lived there; though, for sentient species only, as all non-sentient/undefined go as fauna in Description. Grizmallt, Chorin, Pijal, and Atrisia/Legends seem to be good examples of humans having inhabited a planet and thus being deemed 'inhabitants' in the resultantly named section.—spookywillowwtalk 18:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fairs, done. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to backtrack on this again but this is meant for the content in "Description" itself as noted in the objection for the few sentences, everything past "Inhabitants on the planet included…" in that section. It needs to be moved to an "Inhabitants" section above the "Locations" section per the IU LG sectioning requirements/SAs etc. above and then the resulting linking tweaks stemming from that. The infobox was correct as it was and I've moved that back.—spookywillowwtalk 03:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- My bad, I misread again. How's that? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 10:00, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry to backtrack on this again but this is meant for the content in "Description" itself as noted in the objection for the few sentences, everything past "Inhabitants on the planet included…" in that section. It needs to be moved to an "Inhabitants" section above the "Locations" section per the IU LG sectioning requirements/SAs etc. above and then the resulting linking tweaks stemming from that. The infobox was correct as it was and I've moved that back.—spookywillowwtalk 03:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fairs, done. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 08:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, IU LG has native or resident species for anyone who lived there; though, for sentient species only, as all non-sentient/undefined go as fauna in Description. Grizmallt, Chorin, Pijal, and Atrisia/Legends seem to be good examples of humans having inhabited a planet and thus being deemed 'inhabitants' in the resultantly named section.—spookywillowwtalk 18:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- Is the inhabitants field not specifically for species that originated on the world? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 14:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
The CA mijura presents the beverage as decapitalized; Vernid presents it in the Description as capitalized. Whichever's correct should be made consistent with the other.—spookywillowwtalk 03:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Macaroni
"Vernid was considered..." by whom?- Does this work? I don't want to go play by play on who called it what.
"and notably hauled the worker Grahamos out of a mucking pit" – any indication as to why this is notable?JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)- It was brought up as an example in a conversation between Devon and Klevin, the latter essentially wanting to convey that the other wasn't a coward. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 20:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine, but I think saying "notably" without indication as to why it's notable raises an unnecessary question in the reader's mind - I'd just remove that word if you don't mind. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 21:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- How's that? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 17:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine, but I think saying "notably" without indication as to why it's notable raises an unnecessary question in the reader's mind - I'd just remove that word if you don't mind. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 21:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- It was brought up as an example in a conversation between Devon and Klevin, the latter essentially wanting to convey that the other wasn't a coward. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 20:46, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Imp
Looks like there's info to be noted in the infobox's terrain field.Imperators II(Talk) 08:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)- Done. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 17:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Tommy
Very nice work, one quick thing. The breathable atmosphere is infobox exclusive. I looked to see if this is based on precedent, and it seems other planet FAs actually class such atomospheres at Type 1 (e.g., Bestine IV and Daro). As such, I'd like to see the atmosphere at least mentioned in the body and probably also use the Type 1 classification if you're happy with that.Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 11:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)- How does that look? Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Approved as a Featured article by Inquisitorius 21:42, 7 October 2024 (UTC)