Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Tunroth

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Support

Cull Tremayne 10:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Good stuff. .... 22:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Ugly little guys but still... HappyTimeHarry 02:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
This is an excellent article. And I usually try and find something to object to. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 03:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
--Eyrezer 04:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 10:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
—Silly Dan _(talk) 02:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Volemlock 10:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Objections

~~Couple of unsourced images. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 18:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)~~
All sourced. Cull Tremayne 23:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Expansive in scope. No red links. Incredibly informative. Cull Tremayne 10:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Since it's not a requirement (yet), it hasn't stopped me supporting but any any chance of a lead quote? Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 10:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- It was this kind of situation that led me to object ot the requirement for a lead quote. Basically all the available quotes on Tunroth are in the article, it would be a metter of moving one from its section up to the top. I don't really see any that would particularly add to the article by putting it there. Perhaps the "Wookiees let Tunroths win, too."? --Eyrezer 04:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  - I'd go with that, since it isn't really that relevant to biology. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 09:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
    - I moved the quote. --Eyrezer 04:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Added refs for good measure. --Eyrezer 02:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- One of the main reasons I'm suggesting featuring this article. (Though I think we agreed that page numbers weren't needed, we'll have it standardized by the time this gets on the front page.) —Silly Dan _(talk) 02:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)