Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Thrawn

< Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Thrawn

  1. AdmiralKadann 17:36, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  2. --Maru (talk) Contribs 02:27, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  3. --SOCL 04:09, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  4. Kuralyov 17:03, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  5. KEJ 23:51, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  6. Darth Ocean 18.37, 4 Dec 2005 (GMT)
  7. Geekmasterflash 04:13, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  8. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!) 13:41, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments

  • This article is pretty good but is not up to the Featured Article status, yet. I will place this at the top of my to-do list. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!)
    • If it's not up to featured status, then why did you vote for it...? --MarcK [talk] 13:44, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
      • Because I think It will be by Sunday, and because I felt like it, and because Thrawn is cool. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!) 15:53, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
        • Because of that comment, I removed your vote. Keep it up, and I will remove all your votes. StarNeptune 04:53, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
            • That's nice, very nice indeed. Thank you for your comment, sir StarNeptune. I will take your "words of wisdom" into account. Did you read the other reason that I voted for Thrawn. It is at the top of my to do list Neptune. Maybe if you helped with the article, this debate would not be present. I apoloigze for my bias and prefenance which caused me to vote for Thrawn. I do believe that this article is well written. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!) Sorry for the trouble.
          • It is to my understanding a more or less democratic system. While I find the article to be very, very good I wouldn't want my vote stricken if my reasoning wasn't up to par. If it shouldn't be a feature then the votes will be against it. The system works, the system is great...bow down before the system. Geekmasterflash 04:58, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
            • His vote was stricken because he said himself the article is not up to par, and that he only did it because he thought Thrawn was cool. If you want to debate this, take it to either my talk page, this page's talk page, or the ground rules link up top. StarNeptune 05:06, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
            • After a discussion I had with a few others, his vote has been restored for now. StarNeptune 06:28, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
              • Hew StarNeptune, what ever happened to democracy. You are unfit to be an admin. —Unsigned comment by 71.114.133.34 (talk • contribs)
              • StarNeptune, do you think that people really add pages to the list of Featured Articles because they think that the article is written well. Look at the first few comments under the Mara Jade Featured article section. —Unsigned comment by 71.114.133.34 (talk • contribs)
              • Mr Anon. You are treading on thin ice here. Notice that the Mara article HASN'T been selected? Actual article quality is the main consideration when choosing featured articles.QuentinGeorge 02:39, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • Okay guys, now that this whole debarcle is over, I think that the article is up to featured article status. Thanks for the help. We have really come a long way in a sinlge day. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!)
  • I would hold off on this article until we've settled on how to handle the continuity errors. --SparqMan 00:30, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
  • This week is our week guys! Do you want all of our work to be for nought? I didn't think so! Vote now or make the article even better. Our only competition is Yoda. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!).