Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/The Written Word

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

The Written Word

Hazlett tied the Aurebesh characters to Rakatan symbols, as it had been pointed out to him that icons on the Star Maps in Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (2003). What had been pointed out to him? The sentence is incomplete. - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 12:38, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Completed the sentence based on jSarek's blog. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 13:02, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Infobox is unsourced. Things like the release date aren't self-sourcing; they should be sourced to what is currently reference [1].
In the body, there's no introduction to what The Written Word is actually about. The "development" section starts talking about Basic without linking it or providing context --- why does Hazlett care about Basic? Is that what TWW is about? This article should give a brief overview of the contents of TWW in the development section, so the reader knows why Hazlett would approach aurebesh and all that other stuff. As it stands, it's very confusing if you aren't already familiar with The Written Word, and probably doesn't start to make sense until you get to the "overview" section, which is way too far down for that to happen.
JSarek's endnotes have surely gotta be a source for a wealth of quotes. Menkooroo 13:38, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Meh to the infobox image. JangFett ^(Talk) 03:55, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- This one's even more legitimate! Thefourdotelipsis 04:12, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
  - Aurebesh or something similiar would be better instead of some random TCW image. :P JangFett ^(Talk) 04:21, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
    - Out of curiosity, Jang, what exactly do you call the writing on the signs in that TCW image? ;) - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 19:56, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
I tweaked the Jedi Council Forums links to point directly to the post in question rather than to a general page number, which depends on your posts-per-page setting (something that people like me without an account can't change). With the default of 15 ppp, I was getting posts from 2008 when I clicked the links. —Master Jonathan ^{(Jedi Council Chambers)} 20:44, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, right, thanks for that. Thefourdotelipsis 01:08, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
  - Speaking of that, those citations should really have date, time, and poster as well. It's easier to find the post in general, and when the boards move it'll be a whole lot easier to reconstruct the links. - Lord Hydronium 01:12, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Unaddressed objections dating from the 3rd of October. - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 23:02, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 14:42, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
CC7567 ^(talk) 05:39, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:13, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
—Tommy ⁹²⁸¹ 21:14, November 30, 2010 (UTC)