Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Star Wars Trading Card Game

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Star Wars Trading Card Game

• Nomination by: - Kingpin13^{Cantina Battle Ground} 10:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Hope that this gets through, and improves when if you spot something I've overlooked.

(0 Inqs/0 users/0 total)

Support

Object

1. Shouldn't there be a conception section, as well as a reception section? Create those, and I'll come back to give it an all out review. DC 21:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
   • Added a reception section. Also put a note on your talk page - Kingpin13^{Cantina Battle Ground} 10:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
2. Toprawa's Silver Hammer:
   • Rather than listing each expansion set within that section, the article would benefit from subsectioning each item and briefly providing a brief summary of each, explaining what each new expansion brought to the table, how it changed/contributed to the overall game, etc. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
3. From the cockpit of Xwing328:
   • When did the license switch from Decipher to WotC?
     • Added.
   • The last sentence of the first paragraph and the first sentence of the third paragraph are very redundant.
     • Got rid of the second one.
   • Source the "parry" statement in the Bts.
     • Sourced.
   • Do a major copy edit. There are several typos, and many of your sentences are not grammatically correct. (i.e. "To play the game you will need a deck, this normally means building one, deck building is quite easy, as long as your deck stays within all of these rules it should be legal.") Take this into something like Microsoft Word that has a built in grammar checker if you really need to. Don't forget to italicize titles such as Attack of the Clones.
   • Once you fill out the "Expansions" sections, a select few pictures of some of the expansion sets may complement it nicely.
   • Fill out and source the infobox as much as possible. I imagine the developer was Deciper or WotC? Was there an "engine" (if you could call d6, d12, etc. and engine)? —Xwing328^(Talk) 03:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

• A fundamental problem here is that you have a "Behind the scenes" section in an OOU article. This article should all be about the "Behind the scenes" development of the game, and focus less on how the game is played. Thefourdotelipsis 02:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Don't quite follow, are you saying that the Bts should be combined with the rest of the article and expanded? - Kingpin13^{Cantina Battle Ground} 10:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
    • I'm saying that there should be some kind of information about the conception, and development, and reception, and no BTS at all. It should all be BTS. There should also be an appearances section for the initial set. Thefourdotelipsis 11:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (Inquisitorius only)

1. I'm afraid this is stagnant. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 01:23, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
2. Thefourdotelipsis 23:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
3. -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 23:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
4. --Eyrezer 01:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
5. Graestan^(Talk) 22:37, 3 December 2008 (UTC)